Interconnection Risk Intelligence

Visual Snapshot

quick read

Three charts for fast alignment: timeline estimate, readiness mix, and option gap.

Timeline Estimate

status unanchoredstudy floor n/aconfidence low

batch_zero_eligible not provided — batch track unknown

Readiness Mix

satisfied 4missing 2not_satisfied 5unknown 1

Option Gap (Missing Inputs)

Baseline3 missing

Co Located True3 missing

Export Planned3 missing

Poi Topology Multi3 missing

Single plan3 missing

Options Comparison

choose your next path

Simple view shows a compact comparison. Analyst view includes the full option matrix.

Option	Timeline signal	Inputs needed	Key tradeoff
Current approach (baseline) ★	⚠ No date floor — provide batch_zero_eligible	3 items needed	Ops exposure: high; 3 items still needed
Single energization plan	⚠ No date floor — provide batch_zero_eligible	3 items needed	Ops exposure: high; 3 items still needed
Multi-POI topology	⚠ No date floor — provide batch_zero_eligible	3 items needed	Ops exposure: high; 3 items still needed

★ = recommended option

Show analyst option workbook

Baseline (current)Recommended

Lever Baselineclass unknownSource Baseline

Input changes

No input override

Path

Intake → Large Load Intake (ERCOT) → Completeness Check → Study Path (ERCOT) — Phased plan → Material Change / Re-study Screening → TDSP Routing → Facility Review (TDSP) → Risk Flags → Energization Readiness (gate evaluation) → Decision Memo

Missing inputs

3 total. ack_change_notification_obligation, llis_data_package_submitted, llis_formal_request_submitted

Delta vs baseline

Path unchanged | Missing inputs delta: 0

Risk & timeline

Study floor: n/a (batch_zero_eligible not provided — batch track unknown) | Status: unanchored | Upgrade: Low | Ops: High

Path unchanged vs baseline.

Single energization plan

Lever Phased Energizationclass designSource System Generated Toggle

Input changes

Energization Plan = single

Path

Intake → Large Load Intake (ERCOT) → Completeness Check → Study Path (ERCOT) — Single plan → Material Change / Re-study Screening → TDSP Routing → Facility Review (TDSP) → Risk Flags → Energization Readiness (gate evaluation) → Decision Memo

Missing inputs

3 total. ack_change_notification_obligation, llis_data_package_submitted, llis_formal_request_submitted

Delta vs baseline

Path changed | Missing inputs delta: 0

Risk & timeline

Study floor: n/a (batch_zero_eligible not provided — batch track unknown) | Status: unanchored | Upgrade: Low | Ops: High

Show path diff details

Baseline changed segment: E2P -> E3P_RESTUDY

Option changed segment: E2S -> E3S_RESTUDY

Trigger field deltas

energization_plan: phased -> single

Poi Topology Multi

Lever Poi Topology Choiceclass designSource System Generated Toggle

Input changes

Multiple Poi = True; Poi Count = 2

Path

Intake → Large Load Intake (ERCOT) → Completeness Check → Study Path (ERCOT) — Phased plan → Material Change / Re-study Screening → Configuration Branching (v0 what-if) → TDSP Routing → Facility Review (TDSP) → Risk Flags → Energization Readiness (gate evaluation) → Decision Memo

Missing inputs

3 total. ack_change_notification_obligation, llis_data_package_submitted, llis_formal_request_submitted

Delta vs baseline

Path changed | Missing inputs delta: 0

Risk & timeline

Study floor: n/a (batch_zero_eligible not provided — batch track unknown) | Status: unanchored | Upgrade: Low | Ops: High

Show path diff details

Baseline changed segment: E3R_TO_TDSP

Option changed segment: E3R_CFG_MULTI_POI -> E3C_TO_TDSP

Trigger field deltas

multiple_poi: False -> True

Co Located True

Lever Co Location Signalclass hardSource System Generated Toggle

Input changes

Is Co Located = True

Path

Missing inputs

3 total. ack_change_notification_obligation, llis_data_package_submitted, llis_formal_request_submitted

Delta vs baseline

Path changed | Missing inputs delta: 0

Risk & timeline

Study floor: n/a (batch_zero_eligible not provided — batch track unknown) | Status: unanchored | Upgrade: Low | Ops: High

Show path diff details

Baseline changed segment: E3R_TO_TDSP

Option changed segment: E3R_CFG_CO_LOCATED -> E3C_TO_TDSP

Trigger field deltas

is_co_located: False -> True

Export Planned

Lever Export Capability Choiceclass designSource System Generated Toggle

Input changes

Export Capability = planned

Path

Missing inputs

3 total. ack_change_notification_obligation, llis_data_package_submitted, llis_formal_request_submitted

Delta vs baseline

Path changed | Missing inputs delta: 0

Risk & timeline

Study floor: n/a (batch_zero_eligible not provided — batch track unknown) | Status: unanchored | Upgrade: Low | Ops: High

Show path diff details

Baseline changed segment: E3R_TO_TDSP

Option changed segment: E3R_CFG_EXPORT -> E3C_TO_TDSP

Trigger field deltas

export_capability: none -> planned

Energization Checklist

ready / blocked / unknown

satisfied 4 missing 2 not_satisfied 5 unknown 1 total 12

Status	Requirement	Missing fields	Predicate traces	Guidance
`not_satisfied`	Initial Energization prerequisites include inclusion of the Load in the Network Operations Model (Planning Guide Section 9.6(a)). IDs & citation rule_id `PG9_019_ENERGIZATION_NOM_INCLUSION` doc_id `ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE` loc p.141, Section 9.6(a) ("Inclusion of the Load in the Network Operations Model")	None	`is_requesting_energization==True (True)nom_included==True (False)`	Guidance Guidance sources (docs/raw) source `ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE` PDF p.141, Section 9.6(1)(a) (Inclusion of the Load in the Network Operations Model) source `ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE` PDF p.99, Section 6.6.1(1) (interconnecting TSP shall not add Large Load to NOM until conditions met) source `ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST` PDF p.2 (Energization Request: NOM included; provide NOMCR # / Production Load Date / Maximum MW Modeled) source `ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST` PDF p.3 (Energization Request: ERCOT written approval required before energization) Owner / recipient owner `Interconnecting TSP` recipient `ERCOT` What to do Ensure the Large Load is included in the ERCOT Network Operations Model (NOM) and provide the NOMCR details in the Energization Request for ERCOT written approval prior to energization. Evidence (completion proof) Completed ERCOT Energization Request form fields: NOMCR #, Production Load Date, Maximum MW Modeled, NOMCR contact (form p.2) Attestation on the Energization Request form that the Large Load has been included in the Network Operations Model per Protocols Section 3.10 (form p.2) ERCOT written approval of the Energization Request form prior to energization (form p.3)
`not_satisfied`	Initial Energization prerequisites include verification that all required telemetry is operational and accurate (Planning Guide Section 9.6(b)). IDs & citation rule_id `PG9_020_ENERGIZATION_TELEMETRY_OPERATIONAL` doc_id `ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE` loc p.141, Section 9.6(b) ("required telemetry is operational and accurate")	None	`is_requesting_energization==True (True)telemetry_operational_and_accurate==True (False)`	Guidance Guidance sources (docs/raw) source `ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE` PDF p.141, Section 9.6(1)(b) (Verification that all required telemetry is operational and accurate) source `ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST` PDF p.1 (Energization Request: Entity providing telemetry + telemetry contact fields) source `ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST` PDF p.2 (Energization Request: telemetry operational/accurate as-of date) source `ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST` PDF p.3 (Energization Request: ERCOT written approval required before energization) Owner / recipient owner `Interconnecting TSP` recipient `ERCOT` What to do Confirm required telemetry is operational and accurate (document the as-of date on the Energization Request) and obtain ERCOT written approval prior to energization. Evidence (completion proof) Completed ERCOT Energization Request form: telemetry operational/accurate as-of date (form p.2) Energization Request form contact fields for telemetry questions (form p.1) ERCOT written approval of the Energization Request form prior to energization (form p.3)
`satisfied`	Initial Energization prerequisites include completion and approval of any required Subsynchronous Oscillation (SSO) studies (Planning Guide Section 9.6(d)). IDs & citation rule_id `PG9_021_ENERGIZATION_SSO_COMPLETE_IF_REQUIRED` doc_id `ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE` loc p.141, Section 9.6(d) ("Subsynchronous Oscillation (SSO)")	None	`is_requesting_energization==True (True)sso_required==True (True)sso_complete_and_mitigation_in_place==True (True)`	—
`satisfied`	Initial Energization prerequisites include submission of a current Load Commissioning Plan (LCP) meeting Section 9.2.4 requirements (Planning Guide Section 9.6(e)). IDs & citation rule_id `PG9_022_ENERGIZATION_CURRENT_LCP_REQUIRED` doc_id `ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE` loc p.141, Section 9.6(e) ("Submission of a current Load Commissioning Plan (LCP)")	None	`is_requesting_energization==True (True)`	—
`satisfied`	Energization gating condition references ERCOT communication of LLIS completion (Planning Guide: "ERCOT has communicated the completion of the LLIS..."). IDs & citation rule_id `PG9_023_LLIS_COMPLETION_COMMUNICATED` doc_id `ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE` loc p.100, ("ERCOT has communicated the completion of the LLIS")	None	`is_requesting_energization==True (True)llis_completed_and_ercot_approved==True (True)`	—
`not_satisfied`	Execution of required interconnection agreements and provision of required financial security are gating conditions tied to Planning Guide Section 9.5 responsibilities. IDs & citation rule_id `PG9_024_AGREEMENTS_AND_FINANCIAL_SECURITY` doc_id `ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE` loc pp.139-140, Section 9.5 ("have received the financial security required")	None	`is_requesting_energization==True (True)agreements_executed==True (False)`	—
`Unknown (confirm applicability)`	Initial Energization prerequisites may include completion of ERCOT Quarterly Stability Assessment (QSA) requirements when applicable (Planning Guide Section 9.6(1)(c)). IDs & citation rule_id `PG9_031_ENERGIZATION_QUARTERLY_STABILITY_ASSESSMENT_REQUIRED` doc_id `ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE` loc p.141, Section 9.6(1)(c) ("Completion of the requirements of Section 5.3.5, ERCOT Quarterly Stability Assessment")	None	`ercot_quarterly_stability_assessment_required applicability unknown (absent) => unknown (confirm applicability)`	Guidance Guidance sources (docs/raw) source `ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE` PDF p.141, Section 9.6(1)(c) (Completion of the requirements of Section 5.3.5, ERCOT Quarterly Stability Assessment) source `ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE` PDF pp.77-79, Section 5.3.5 (Quarterly Stability Assessment: eligibility, prerequisites, deadlines) source `ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE` PDF p.79, Section 5.3.5(7) (ERCOT posts QSA results report to MIS Secure Area within 10 Business Days) Owner / recipient owner `Interconnecting TSP / ERCOT` recipient `ERCOT` What to do If applicable for the target energization period, ensure the project meets the prerequisites for inclusion in ERCOT's Quarterly Stability Assessment (Section 5.3.5) and track completion of the assessment/results report before energization. Evidence (completion proof) ERCOT quarterly stability assessment completed for the relevant period (Planning Guide Section 5.3.5) and results report posted to the MIS Secure Area (PG 5.3.5(7)) Prerequisites for Large Load inclusion in the quarterly stability assessment satisfied by the applicable deadlines (PG 5.3.5(2)/(5))
`missing`	As part of Section 9.5.1 prerequisites, the interconnecting TSP has received notice to proceed with construction of all required interconnection facilities (Planning Guide Section 9.5.1(iii)). IDs & citation rule_id `PG9_034_NOTICE_TO_PROCEED_INTERCONNECTION_FACILITIES_REQUIRED` doc_id `ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE` loc p.139, Section 9.5.1(iii) ("The interconnecting TSP has received notice to proceed with the construction of all required interconnection Facilities")	`notice_to_proceed_received`	`is_requesting_energization==True (True)notice_to_proceed_received missing`	—
`missing`	For transmission-voltage Large Load interconnections, confirm the required permanent breaker configuration is in place/confirmed (Planning Guide Section 9.2.5). IDs & citation rule_id `PG9_036_ENERGIZATION_BREAKER_CONFIGURATION_CONFIRMED_IF_TRANSMISSION_VOLTAGE` doc_id `ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE` loc p.131, Section 9.2.5(1)-(2) ("interconnected at transmission voltage"; breaker configuration; remote control by TO / direction of QSE)	`interconnection_breaker_configuration_confirmed`	`is_requesting_energization==True (True)interconnection_breaker_configuration_confirmed missing`	Guidance Guidance sources (docs/raw) source `ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE` PDF p.131, Section 9.2.5(1)-(2) (Required interconnection equipment; breaker configuration; remote control) Owner / recipient owner `Interconnecting TSP / TDSP / TO` recipient `ERCOT (as energization approver) / affected TO/QSE` What to do Confirm and document the required transmission-voltage breaker configuration (fault interruption + remote control) per Planning Guide Section 9.2.5. Evidence (completion proof) One-line / switching diagram showing the permanent breaker configuration at the Service Delivery Point(s) (PG Section 9.2.5) Confirmation that breakers are capable of interrupting fault current and are remotely controllable as required (PG Section 9.2.5)
`not_satisfied`	If facility is a Large Electronic Load (LEL), it must be included in ERCOT interim ride-through assessment. IDs & citation rule_id `LLI_EN_005_LEL_INTERIM_ASSESSMENT` doc_id `ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST` loc p.2, "Large Electronic Load (LEL)"	None	`is_requesting_energization==True (True)is_large_electronic_load==True (True)lel_interim_assessment_complete==True (False)`	Guidance Guidance sources (docs/raw) source `ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST` PDF p.2 (LEL: included in ERCOT interim ride-through assessment) Owner / recipient owner `Interconnecting TSP` recipient `ERCOT` What to do If the facility is a Large Electronic Load (LEL), ensure it is included in the required ERCOT interim ride-through assessment before energization. Evidence (completion proof) Energization Request form: if facility is a Large Electronic Load (LEL), confirmation that it has been included in an ERCOT interim ride-through assessment (form p.2)
`satisfied`	ILLE must confirm no substantial changes in load composition or parameters from dynamic model used in LLIS Stability Study. IDs & citation rule_id `LLI_EN_007_MODEL_CONSISTENCY` doc_id `ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST` loc p.2, "no changes have been made to the load composition"	None	`is_requesting_energization==True (True)model_consistency_confirmed==True (True)`	Guidance Guidance sources (docs/raw) source `ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST` PDF p.2 (written acknowledgement from ILLE: no substantial changes vs dynamic model) Owner / recipient owner `Interconnecting TSP / ILLE` recipient `ERCOT` What to do Obtain the ILLE's written acknowledgement that no substantial changes have been made vs the dynamic model assumptions used in the LLIS stability study. Evidence (completion proof) Written acknowledgement from the ILLE that no substantial changes have been made vs the dynamic model used in the LLIS Stability Study (form p.2) Energization Request form attestation that the interconnecting TSP has received this acknowledgement (form p.2)
`not_satisfied`	If ERCOT requires Disturbance Monitoring Equipment (DME), it must be installed and operational. IDs & citation rule_id `LLI_EN_012_DME_REQUIRED` doc_id `ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST` loc p.2, "Is the DME installed and configured?"	None	`is_requesting_energization==True (True)dme_required==True (True)dme_installed_and_operational==True (False)`	Guidance Guidance sources (docs/raw) source `ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST` PDF p.2 (DME required? If yes, installed/configured and provide operational date) Owner / recipient owner `Interconnecting TSP` recipient `ERCOT` What to do If ERCOT requires DME for the facility, install/configure the DME and document the operational date as part of the Energization Request. Evidence (completion proof) Energization Request form: ERCOT notification whether DME is required; if required, confirmation DME installed/configured and projected operational date (form p.2)

Project Details

input snapshot

Operator area

ERCOT

TDSP area

ONCOR

Load (MW total)

300

COD target window

2026Q3

Requesting energization?

True

Process path

Show raw request JSON

{
  "project_name": "DC_ONCOR_300MW_Energization_Check_2026Q3",
  "project_type": "large_load",
  "operator_area": "ERCOT",
  "tdsp_area": "ONCOR",
  "load_mw_total": 300,
  "energization_plan": "phased",
  "phases": [
    {
      "mw": 150,
      "target_window": "2026Q3"
    },
    {
      "mw": 150,
      "target_window": "2026Q4"
    }
  ],
  "poi_hint": "Oncor area, new substation likely",
  "poi_count": 1,
  "multiple_poi": false,
  "is_co_located": false,
  "export_capability": "none",
  "context": {
    "as_of": "2026-02-13",
    "signals": [
      {
        "signal_id": "queue_density",
        "type": "queue_density",
        "value": "high",
        "confidence": 0.7,
        "source": "pilot snapshot (manual)",
        "notes": "Example context input for v0 demo"
      },
      {
        "signal_id": "queue_dependency",
        "type": "queue_dependency",
        "value": true,
        "confidence": 0.6,
        "source": "pilot snapshot (manual)"
      },
      {
        "signal_id": "must_study",
        "type": "must_study",
        "value": true,
        "confidence": 0.8,
        "source": "pilot snapshot (manual)"
      }
    ]
  },
  "voltage_options": [
    345
  ],
  "cod_target_window": "2026Q3",
  "requested_energization_window": "2026Q3",
  "load_profile_type": "baseload",
  "is_new_interconnection": true,
  "one_line_diagram": true,
  "load_projection_5y": true,
  "peak_power_factor": 0.99,
  "load_commissioning_plan_provided": true,
  "application_fee_paid": true,
  "is_large_electronic_load": true,
  "lel_interim_assessment_complete": false,
  "model_consistency_confirmed": true,
  "telemetry_operational_and_accurate": false,
  "sso_required": true,
  "sso_complete_and_mitigation_in_place": true,
  "dme_required": true,
  "dme_installed_and_operational": false,
  "is_requesting_energization": true,
  "llis_completed_and_ercot_approved": true,
  "agreements_executed": false,
  "financial_security_posted": false,
  "nom_included": false,
  "material_change_flags": [
    "timeline_accelerated"
  ],
  "voltage_options_kv": [
    345
  ],
  "voltage_choice_kv": 345.0,
  "poi_voltage_class": "transmission",
  "poi_voltage_class_is_transmission": true,
  "poi_voltage_class_is_distribution": false
}

Context Snapshot

non-audit evidence

External/system context recorded for transparency. This is not citation-audited evidence.

as_of 2026-02-13

signal_id	type	value	confidence	source	notes	v0 effect
`queue_density`	`queue_density`	high	`0.7`	pilot snapshot (manual)	Example context input for v0 demo	`up:+0` `wait:+2` `ops:+0`
`queue_dependency`	`queue_dependency`	true	`0.6`	pilot snapshot (manual)	n/a	`up:+0` `wait:+1` `ops:+0`
`must_study`	`must_study`	true	`0.8`	pilot snapshot (manual)	n/a	`up:+0` `wait:+1` `ops:+0`

No external context snapshots found. Run python src/ingest_context.py to fetch configured sources (see context/context_sources.json).

Process Path

deterministic traversal

Selected path (timeline)

Step bubbles show traversal order; transition chips show edge id and triggering criteria.

1
StartN0
Intake
E0project_type==large_load (large_load)
2
StepN1
Large Load Intake (ERCOT)
E1Default route
3
StepN2
Completeness Check
E2Pexists(load_mw_total)=True | exists(tdsp_area)=True | ...
4
StepN3P
Study Path (ERCOT) — Phased plan
E3P_RESTUDYany_true(material_change_flags in ['poi_changed', 'timeline_accelerated', 'load_type_changed', 'control_system_changed']) (['timeline_accelerated'])
5
StepN3R
Material Change / Re-study Screening
E3R_TO_TDSPDefault route
6
StepN3T
TDSP Routing
E4_ONCORtdsp_area==ONCOR (ONCOR)
7
StepN4
Facility Review (TDSP)
E5_ONCORDefault route
8
StepN5
Risk Flags
E6_ENERGIZATIONis_requesting_energization==True (True)
9
StepN5E
Energization Readiness (gate evaluation)
E6E_TO_MEMODefault route
10
OutcomeN6
Decision Memo

Full process graph

Main path is highlighted in blue. Parallel non-selected branches are collapsed as route-count labels to reduce clutter.

At zoom >100%, press and hold the left mouse button anywhere inside the blue graph panel (node, line, or blank area) and drag to pan. You can also use Shift+wheel / horizontal trackpad gestures or the ← → buttons.

Edge audit log (predicate traces + citations)

edge_id	from → to	criteria traces	rule_ids
`E0`	`N0` → `N1`	`project_type==large_load (large_load)`	None
`E1`	`N1` → `N2`	None	`ERCOT_LLI_INTAKE_REQUIRED_DOCS` `PG9_001_LLIS_APPLICABILITY_SUBJECT_TO_LLIS` `LL_QA_003_TSP_INITIATION` `LL_QA_004_LOAD_COMMISSIONING_PLAN` `LL_QA_005_APPLICATION_FEE` `PG9_005_LLIS_PREINIT_PRELIM_LCP_REQUIRED` `PG9_006_LLIS_PREINIT_WRITTEN_ACK_REQUIRED` `PG9_007_LLIS_PREINIT_FORMAL_REQUEST_REQUIRED` `PG9_008_LLIS_PREINIT_APPLICATION_FEE_REQUIRED` `PG9_025_LLIS_PREINIT_STUDY_DATA_PACKAGE_REQUIRED` `PG9_002_LLIS_APPLICABILITY_NEW_LARGE_LOAD` `PG9_003_LLIS_APPLICABILITY_MOD_INCREASE_AGGREGATE_PEAK` `PG9_004_LLIS_APPLICABILITY_POI_CHANGE_OR_ADD` `LL_QA_002_SECTION9_APPLICABILITY` `PG9_013_LCP_SECTION_9_2_4` `PUCT_001_PROJECT_58481_RULEMAKING_DEPENDENCY` `PUCT_002_REGULATORY_CHANGE_MAY_ALTER_LLIS_OBLIGATIONS` `POLICY_001_TEXAS_TRIBUNE_DATA_CENTER_ERCOT_NEW_FRAMEWORK` `LLI_INTAKE_LOAD_INFORMATION_FORM_V1_REQUIRED` `LLI_COMMUNICATION_INSTRUCTIONS_SUBMISSION_CHANNELS` `PGRR_136_STUDY_SCOPE_DOCUMENTATION_PENDING` `PGRR_138_STUDY_REVIEW_APPROVAL_PROCESS_PENDING` `PGRR_141_SUBSTANTIATED_LOAD_REFORM_PENDING` `PGRR_134_DISPATCHABLE_LOAD_REFORM_PENDING` `PGRR_144_DYNAMIC_MODEL_LARGE_ELECTRONIC_LOADS_PENDING`
`E2P`	`N2` → `N3P`	`exists(load_mw_total)=Trueexists(tdsp_area)=Trueenergization_plan==phased (phased)`	`LL_QA_001_LARGE_LOAD_DEFINITION` `PG9_028_LCP_PHASES_REQUIRED_IF_PHASED_PLAN` `ONC_003_LOAD_PROJECTION` `ONC_004_ONE_LINE_DIAGRAM`
`E3P_RESTUDY`	`N3P` → `N3R`	`any_true(material_change_flags in ['poi_changed', 'timeline_accelerated', 'load_type_changed', 'control_system_changed']) (['timeline_accelerated'])`	`LL_QA_006_MATERIAL_CHANGE` `LL_QA_009_MUST_STUDY` `LL_QA_010_RESTUDY_QUEUE` `PG9_011_PROJECT_INFO_UPDATE_10_BUSINESS_DAYS` `PG9_012_DYNAMIC_MODEL_CHANGE_IMPACTS_LLIS` `PG9_026_MATERIAL_CHANGE_NOTIFY_LEAD_TSP` `PG9_027_NEW_STABILITY_STUDY_DETERMINATION_IF_SUBSTANTIAL_CHANGE` `RESTUDY_001_MATERIAL_CHANGE_UNDER_BATCH_CYCLE`
`E3R_TO_TDSP`	`N3R` → `N3T`	None	`LL_QA_006_MATERIAL_CHANGE` `RESTUDY_001_MATERIAL_CHANGE_UNDER_BATCH_CYCLE` `RESTUDY_002_QUEUE_DISRUPTION_NEARBY_MUST_STUDY` `BATCH_001_BATCH_STUDY_PROCESS_PENDING_POLICY` `BATCH_002_BATCH_CYCLE_WINDOW_DEPENDENCY` `BATCH_005_QUEUE_POSITION_GOVERNANCE_DEPENDENCY` `BATCH_006_BATCH_ZERO_A_FIRM_LOAD_QUALIFICATION` `BATCH_007_BATCH_ZERO_B_COMMITMENT_DEADLINE`
`E4_ONCOR`	`N3T` → `N4`	`tdsp_area==ONCOR (ONCOR)`	`LL_QA_007_REQUIRED_STUDIES` `LL_QA_008_SSO_REQUIRED` `ONC_002_VOLTAGE_AVAILABILITY` `ONC_002A_MULTI_VOLTAGE_OPTIONS_138_AND_345` `ONC_002B_MULTI_VOLTAGE_OPTIONS_69_AND_138` `ONC_002C_MULTI_VOLTAGE_OPTIONS_69_AND_345`
`E5_ONCOR`	`N4` → `N5`	None	`ONCOR_520_106_SYSTEM_PROTECTION_REQUIREMENTS` `ONC_001_TRANSMISSION_VOLTAGE_SCOPE` `ONC_005_FAULT_INTERRUPT_RATING` `ONC_006_DUAL_FAULT_SENSING_CLOSE` `ONC_007_6_CYCLE_CLEARING` `ONC_008_3_CYCLE_BREAKER` `ONC_009_REVENUE_METERING` `ONC_010_NOMCR_APPROVAL` `ONC_011_LOAD_REMOVAL_RIGHT` `PG9_029_CANCELLATION_RISK_IF_SECTION_9_5_NOT_SATISFIED_180_DAYS_AGREEMENTS` `PG9_029B_CANCELLATION_RISK_IF_SECTION_9_5_NOT_SATISFIED_180_DAYS_FINANCIAL_SECURITY` `FAR_WEST_004_STUDY_RESULTS_MAY_EXPIRE_UNDER_CHANGED_SCENARIOS`
`E6_ENERGIZATION`	`N5` → `N5E`	`is_requesting_energization==True (True)`	`LLI_EN_001_WRITTEN_APPROVAL_REQUIRED` `LLI_EN_002_NEW_ONLY` `LLI_EN_003_LLIS_COMPLETE` `LLI_EN_004_SSO_APPLICABILITY` `LLI_EN_004_SSO_COMPLETE` `LLI_EN_005_LEL_INTERIM_ASSESSMENT` `LLI_EN_006_AGREEMENTS_AND_SECURITY` `LLI_EN_007_MODEL_CONSISTENCY` `LLI_EN_011_NETWORK_MODEL` `LLI_EN_012_DME_APPLICABILITY` `LLI_EN_012_DME_REQUIRED` `LLI_EN_013_TELEMETRY_OPERATIONAL` `LL_QA_012_NETWORK_MODEL` `LL_QA_013_RIDE_THROUGH` `PG9_019_ENERGIZATION_NOM_INCLUSION` `PG9_020_ENERGIZATION_TELEMETRY_OPERATIONAL` `PG9_021_ENERGIZATION_SSO_COMPLETE_IF_REQUIRED` `PG9_022_ENERGIZATION_CURRENT_LCP_REQUIRED` `PG9_023_LLIS_COMPLETION_COMMUNICATED` `PG9_024_AGREEMENTS_AND_FINANCIAL_SECURITY` `PG9_030_365_DAY_INITIAL_ENERGIZATION_RESTUDY_OPINION` `PG9_031_ENERGIZATION_QUARTERLY_STABILITY_ASSESSMENT_REQUIRED` `PG9_034_NOTICE_TO_PROCEED_INTERCONNECTION_FACILITIES_REQUIRED` `PG9_036_ENERGIZATION_BREAKER_CONFIGURATION_CONFIRMED_IF_TRANSMISSION_VOLTAGE` `PUCT_003_RULEMAKING_MAY_AFFECT_ENERGIZATION_REQUIREMENTS`
`E6E_TO_MEMO`	`N5E` → `N6`	None	`LL_QA_011_ENERGIZATION_REQUIREMENTS` `LL_QA_012_NETWORK_MODEL` `LL_QA_013_RIDE_THROUGH` `LL_QA_014_365_DAY_RULE` `LL_QA_015_CONSUMPTION_LIMIT` `LLI_EN_001_WRITTEN_APPROVAL_REQUIRED` `LLI_EN_002_NEW_ONLY` `LLI_EN_003_LLIS_COMPLETE` `LLI_EN_004_SSO_APPLICABILITY` `LLI_EN_004_SSO_COMPLETE` `LLI_EN_005_LEL_INTERIM_ASSESSMENT` `LLI_EN_006_AGREEMENTS_AND_SECURITY` `LLI_EN_007_MODEL_CONSISTENCY` `LLI_EN_008_NOTIFY_CHANGES` `LLI_EN_009_CONSUMPTION_LIMIT` `LLI_EN_010_PEAK_INCREASE_FORM` `LLI_EN_011_NETWORK_MODEL` `LLI_EN_012_DME_APPLICABILITY` `LLI_EN_012_DME_REQUIRED` `LLI_EN_013_TELEMETRY_OPERATIONAL` `PG9_019_ENERGIZATION_NOM_INCLUSION` `PG9_020_ENERGIZATION_TELEMETRY_OPERATIONAL` `PG9_021_ENERGIZATION_SSO_COMPLETE_IF_REQUIRED` `PG9_022_ENERGIZATION_CURRENT_LCP_REQUIRED` `PG9_023_LLIS_COMPLETION_COMMUNICATED` `PG9_024_AGREEMENTS_AND_FINANCIAL_SECURITY` `PG9_030_365_DAY_INITIAL_ENERGIZATION_RESTUDY_OPINION` `PG9_031_ENERGIZATION_QUARTERLY_STABILITY_ASSESSMENT_REQUIRED` `PG9_034_NOTICE_TO_PROCEED_INTERCONNECTION_FACILITIES_REQUIRED` `PG9_036_ENERGIZATION_BREAKER_CONFIGURATION_CONFIRMED_IF_TRANSMISSION_VOLTAGE` `PG9_014_LCP_UPDATE_AFTER_LLIS_COMPLETION` `PG9_015_LCP_UPDATE_AFTER_AGREEMENTS_EXECUTED` `PUCT_003_RULEMAKING_MAY_AFFECT_ENERGIZATION_REQUIREMENTS`

Missing Inputs

from graph + rules

ack_change_notification_obligation llis_data_package_submitted llis_formal_request_submitted

Uncertainty & Dependencies

explain what is unknown

missing 3 assumptions 3 operator discretion 5 queue-state dependent 6

Missing breakdown

absent 3

Show non-cited assumptions (heuristics)

Heuristics are explicitly labeled and contribute to v0 risk buckets; they are not backed by PDF citations.

rule_id	loc	note
`HEUR_LOAD_MW_GTE_300`	non-cited heuristic: large load (MW total ≥ 300) increases upgrade exposure pressure	load_mw_total=300.0 => upgrade +1.0
`HEUR_MISSING_INPUTS_PRESENT_INCREASES_WAIT_PRESSURE`	non-cited heuristic: missing inputs increase process waiting/latency pressure	missing_inputs_count=3 => wait +0.5
`HEUR_PHASED_PLAN_REDUCES_UPGRADE_PRESSURE`	non-cited heuristic: phased energization plan can reduce upgrade exposure pressure in screening	energization_plan=phased => upgrade -0.5

Show operator discretion signals

These signals indicate engineering / operator judgement may materially affect outcomes.

rule_id	doc_id	loc	tags
`ONC_002A_MULTI_VOLTAGE_OPTIONS_138_AND_345`	`ONCOR_STD_520_106`	Section 3.4.1, p.3 ("The actual voltage for a Point of Delivery will be determined through analyses"; "Not all voltages may be available")	`process_latency` `study_dependency` `voltage_selection_risk`
`ONC_002B_MULTI_VOLTAGE_OPTIONS_69_AND_138`	`ONCOR_STD_520_106`	Section 3.4.1, p.3 ("The actual voltage for a Point of Delivery will be determined through analyses"; "Not all voltages may be available")	`process_latency` `study_dependency` `voltage_selection_risk`
`ONC_002C_MULTI_VOLTAGE_OPTIONS_69_AND_345`	`ONCOR_STD_520_106`	Section 3.4.1, p.3 ("The actual voltage for a Point of Delivery will be determined through analyses"; "Not all voltages may be available")	`process_latency` `study_dependency` `voltage_selection_risk`
`ONC_002_VOLTAGE_AVAILABILITY`	`ONCOR_STD_520_106`	Section 3.4.1, p.3	`voltage_selection_risk`
`ONC_004_ONE_LINE_DIAGRAM`	`ONCOR_STD_520_106`	Section 4.1.6, p.6	`data_completeness` `engineering_review` `process_latency`

Show queue-state dependent signals

These signals depend on queue density / dependencies; timelines can change as other projects progress.

rule_id	doc_id	loc	tags
`LL_QA_009_MUST_STUDY`	`ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA`	p.10–11, Planning Guide Section 9.3.4.1	`financial_security` `must_study` `queue_dependency` `study_dependency`
`LL_QA_010_RESTUDY_QUEUE`	`ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA`	p.10, "studies of other nearby large"	`queue_density` `re_study` `timeline_risk`
`RESTUDY_001_MATERIAL_CHANGE_UNDER_BATCH_CYCLE`	`ERCOT_LLI_BATCH_STUDY_PPT_20260122`	Slide 5-7, ERCOT-Large-Load-Batch-Studies-LLWG_01222026.pptx (Slide 5: Transitional Batch Zero and restudy context; Slide 7: TSP role changes impacting in-progress LLI requests during batch transition)	`batch_study` `queue_dependency` `re_study` `restudy_risk` `timeline_risk`
`BATCH_005_QUEUE_POSITION_GOVERNANCE_DEPENDENCY`	`ERCOT_LLI_BATCH_STUDY_WORKSHOP_20260203`	ERCOT-Large-Load-Batch-Study-Workshop-02032026.pptx, Slide 36-37 (Load Allocation Methodology — SCOPF-based); Slide 16 (Zero A/B capacity by sub-batch).	`batch_study` `governance_dependency` `process_latency` `queue_dependency`
`POLICY_001_TEXAS_TRIBUNE_DATA_CENTER_ERCOT_NEW_FRAMEWORK`	`ERCOT_MARKET_NOTICE_A122325_01`	p.1, M-A122325-01 (context: public reporting of ERCOT shift to data-center batch study framework)	`batch_study` `governance_dependency` `queue_density` `timeline_risk`
`RESTUDY_002_QUEUE_DISRUPTION_NEARBY_MUST_STUDY`	`ERCOT_MARKET_NOTICE_A122325_01`	p.1, M-A122325-01 – LONG DESCRIPTION: structural challenges including "coordination across TSPs, repeated restudies, and a growing backlog." Also corroborated by Q&A Rev.12.15.25 p.10: "A common reason re-studies are needed is that another large load customer in the same area becomes a must-study load."	`batch_study` `queue_density` `restudy_risk` `study_dependency` `timeline_risk`

Levers Detected

decision inputs

Top levers to decide next

lever	class	label	ask next (fields)	observed delta	rule refs	rule check flips
`co_location_signal`	class `hard`	Co-location / shared infrastructure signal	None	`options=1 \| path_changed \| missingΔ[+0,+0]`	`5`	missing→sat `0`not_sat→sat `4` Show rules missing → satisfied None not_satisfied → satisfied `LL_QA_017_CO_LOCATED_WITH_GENERATION_IN_SCOPE` — is_co_located == True `PG9_034_REQUIRED_INTERCONNECTION_EQUIPMENT_BREAKERS_TRANSMISSION_COLOCATED` — is_co_located == True `PGRR_133_LEGACY_BREAKER_CONTROL_PENDING` — is_co_located == True `QA_REV1215_COLOCATION_APPLICABILITY_UPDATED` — is_co_located == True
`export_capability_choice`	class `design`	Export capability posture	None	`options=1 \| path_changed \| missingΔ[+0,+0]`	`2`	missing→sat `0`not_sat→sat `2` Show rules missing → satisfied None not_satisfied → satisfied `LL_QA_018_NET_METERING_REVIEW_MAY_APPLY` — export_capability in ['possible', 'planned'] `QA_REV1215_NET_METERING_SB6_APPROVAL_REQUIRED` — export_capability in ['possible', 'planned']
`phased_energization`	class `design`	Phased energization plan	None	`options=1 \| path_changed \| missingΔ[+0,+0]`	`2`	missing→sat `0`not_sat→sat `0`
`poi_topology_choice`	class `design`	POI topology (single vs multiple POIs)	None	`options=1 \| path_changed \| missingΔ[+0,+0]`	`1`	missing→sat `0`not_sat→sat `1` Show rules missing → satisfied None not_satisfied → satisfied `LL_QA_016_MULTI_POI_SCREEN_AS_SEPARATE_SITES` — multiple_poi == True
`batch_study_governance`	class `external`	Batch study process & queue governance	`batch_zero_eligible` `batch_cycle_window` `queue_position`	`no_options_generated`	`5`	missing→sat `5`not_sat→sat `0` Show rules missing → satisfied `BATCH_002_BATCH_CYCLE_WINDOW_DEPENDENCY` — provide batch_cycle_window `BATCH_003_FAST_TRACK_PATH_IF_ELIGIBLE` — provide batch_zero_eligible `BATCH_005_QUEUE_POSITION_GOVERNANCE_DEPENDENCY` — provide queue_position `BATCH_006_BATCH_ZERO_A_FIRM_LOAD_QUALIFICATION` — provide batch_zero_eligible `BATCH_007_BATCH_ZERO_B_COMMITMENT_DEADLINE` — provide batch_zero_eligible not_satisfied → satisfied None

lever_id	class	note
`phased_energization`	class `design`	Request includes a phased energization plan (can be used as an option lever).
`poi_topology_choice`	class `design`	Request includes POI topology inputs (single vs multiple POIs), which can change screening path/options.
`co_location_signal`	class `hard`	Request includes a co-location/shared-infrastructure signal (configuration complexity lever).
`export_capability_choice`	class `design`	Request includes an export capability posture input (configuration lever; can affect ops/study exposure).

Lever coverage (rules referencing lever fields)

lever_id	class	label	present fields	missing fields	rule refs	example rule_ids
`phased_energization`	class `design`	Phased energization plan	`energization_plan` `phases`	None	`2`	`LL_QA_004_LOAD_COMMISSIONING_PLAN` `PG9_028_LCP_PHASES_REQUIRED_IF_PHASED_PLAN`
`voltage_level_choice`	class `design`	POI voltage level choice	`voltage_options_kv` `voltage_choice_kv` `poi_voltage_class`	None	`13`	`ONC_001_TRANSMISSION_VOLTAGE_SCOPE` `ONC_002A_MULTI_VOLTAGE_OPTIONS_138_AND_345` `ONC_002B_MULTI_VOLTAGE_OPTIONS_69_AND_138` `ONC_002C_MULTI_VOLTAGE_OPTIONS_69_AND_345` `ONC_002_VOLTAGE_AVAILABILITY` `ONC_003_LOAD_PROJECTION` `ONC_004_ONE_LINE_DIAGRAM` `ONC_005_FAULT_INTERRUPT_RATING` …
`poi_topology_choice`	class `design`	POI topology (single vs multiple POIs)	`poi_count` `multiple_poi`	None	`1`	`LL_QA_016_MULTI_POI_SCREEN_AS_SEPARATE_SITES`
`co_location_signal`	class `hard`	Co-location / shared infrastructure signal	`is_co_located`	None	`5`	`LL_QA_017_CO_LOCATED_WITH_GENERATION_IN_SCOPE` `PG9_033_REQUIRED_INTERCONNECTION_EQUIPMENT_BREAKERS_TRANSMISSION_NOT_COLOCATED` `PG9_034_REQUIRED_INTERCONNECTION_EQUIPMENT_BREAKERS_TRANSMISSION_COLOCATED` `PGRR_133_LEGACY_BREAKER_CONTROL_PENDING` `QA_REV1215_COLOCATION_APPLICABILITY_UPDATED`
`export_capability_choice`	class `design`	Export capability posture	`export_capability`	None	`2`	`LL_QA_018_NET_METERING_REVIEW_MAY_APPLY` `QA_REV1215_NET_METERING_SB6_APPROVAL_REQUIRED`
`energization_posture_timing`	class `design`	Energization posture & timing	`is_requesting_energization` `requested_energization_window`	None	`29`	`LLI_EN_001_WRITTEN_APPROVAL_REQUIRED` `LLI_EN_002_NEW_ONLY` `LLI_EN_003_LLIS_COMPLETE` `LLI_EN_004_SSO_APPLICABILITY` `LLI_EN_004_SSO_COMPLETE` `LLI_EN_005_LEL_INTERIM_ASSESSMENT` `LLI_EN_006_AGREEMENTS_AND_SECURITY` `LLI_EN_007_MODEL_CONSISTENCY` …
`change_control_restudy`	class `design`	Change control / re-study triggers	`material_change_flags`	None	`6`	`LL_QA_006_MATERIAL_CHANGE` `PG9_011_PROJECT_INFO_UPDATE_10_BUSINESS_DAYS` `PG9_012_DYNAMIC_MODEL_CHANGE_IMPACTS_LLIS` `PG9_026_MATERIAL_CHANGE_NOTIFY_LEAD_TSP` `PG9_027_NEW_STABILITY_STUDY_DETERMINATION_IF_SUBSTANTIAL_CHANGE` `RESTUDY_001_MATERIAL_CHANGE_UNDER_BATCH_CYCLE`
`agreements_security_ntp`	class `design`	Agreements, financial security & notice-to-proceed	`llis_completed_and_ercot_approved` `agreements_executed` `financial_security_posted`	`notice_to_proceed_received`	`10`	`FAR_WEST_004_STUDY_RESULTS_MAY_EXPIRE_UNDER_CHANGED_SCENARIOS` `LLI_EN_003_LLIS_COMPLETE` `LLI_EN_006_AGREEMENTS_AND_SECURITY` `LL_QA_009_MUST_STUDY` `LL_QA_011_ENERGIZATION_REQUIREMENTS` `PG9_023_LLIS_COMPLETION_COMMUNICATED` `PG9_024_AGREEMENTS_AND_FINANCIAL_SECURITY` `PG9_029B_CANCELLATION_RISK_IF_SECTION_9_5_NOT_SATISFIED_180_DAYS_FINANCIAL_SECURITY` …
`llis_data_package_readiness`	class `design`	LLIS study data package readiness	None	`llis_data_package_submitted`	`1`	`PG9_025_LLIS_PREINIT_STUDY_DATA_PACKAGE_REQUIRED`
`quarterly_stability_readiness`	class `design`	ERCOT quarterly stability assessment readiness (if applicable)	None	`ercot_quarterly_stability_assessment_complete`	`1`	`PG9_031_ENERGIZATION_QUARTERLY_STABILITY_ASSESSMENT_REQUIRED`
`batch_study_governance`	class `external`	Batch study process & queue governance	None	`batch_zero_eligible` `batch_cycle_window` `queue_position`	`5`	`BATCH_002_BATCH_CYCLE_WINDOW_DEPENDENCY` `BATCH_003_FAST_TRACK_PATH_IF_ELIGIBLE` `BATCH_005_QUEUE_POSITION_GOVERNANCE_DEPENDENCY` `BATCH_006_BATCH_ZERO_A_FIRM_LOAD_QUALIFICATION` `BATCH_007_BATCH_ZERO_B_COMMITMENT_DEADLINE`
`geo_region`	class `hard`	Geographic region (ERCOT zone / area)	None	`region`	`4`	`FAR_WEST_001_NO_SOLAR_SCENARIO_CONSTRAINT` `FAR_WEST_002_STUDY_ASSUMPTIONS_MAY_CHANGE_GENERATOR_LANDSCAPE` `FAR_WEST_003_AREA_SPECIFIC_UPGRADE_EXPOSURE` `FAR_WEST_004_STUDY_RESULTS_MAY_EXPIRE_UNDER_CHANGED_SCENARIOS`

Parallel Flags

predicate matches outside main path

rule_id	doc_id	loc	tags	match traces
`PG9_033_REQUIRED_INTERCONNECTION_EQUIPMENT_BREAKERS_TRANSMISSION_NOT_COLOCATED`	`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	p.131, Section 9.2.5(1) ("interconnected at transmission voltage"; "must have ... breakers capable of interrupting fault current"; "remote control" by TO)	`protection` `upgrade_exposure` `process_latency`	`load_mw_total>=75 (300)poi_voltage_class==transmission (transmission)is_co_located==False (False)`
`PG9_016_STEADY_STATE_ANALYSIS_ELEMENT`	`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	p.135, Section 9.3.4.1 ("9.3.4.1 Steady-State Analysis")	`steady_state` `study_dependency`	`load_mw_total>=75 (300)`
`PG9_017_SYSTEM_PROTECTION_SHORT_CIRCUIT_ELEMENT`	`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	p.136, Section 9.3.4.2 ("System Protection (Short-Circuit) Analysis")	`short_circuit` `protection` `study_dependency`	`load_mw_total>=75 (300)`
`PG9_018_DYNAMIC_TRANSIENT_STABILITY_ELEMENT`	`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	p.136, Section 9.3.4.3 ("Dynamic and Transient Stability Analysis")	`dynamic_stability` `study_dependency`	`load_mw_total>=75 (300)`
`BATCH_004_WORKSHOP_PROCESS_ONGOING`	`ERCOT_LLI_BATCH_STUDY_WORKSHOP_20260203`	ERCOT-Large-Load-Batch-Study-Workshop-02032026.pptx, Slide 2 (disclaimer), Slide 47-48 (next steps); PUCT Open Meeting 2026-02-20.	`batch_study` `governance_dependency` `timeline_dependency` `policy_update`	`load_mw_total>=75 (300)`
`QA_REV1215_BATCH_STUDY_REFERENCE_PROCESS`	`ERCOT_MARKET_NOTICE_A122325_01`	p.1, M-A122325-01 (batch study process announcement, Dec 23 2025; PGRR115 already insufficient; batch study as successor framework)	`batch_study` `process_latency` `policy_update`	`load_mw_total>=75 (300)`
`MARKET_NOTICE_001_ERCOT_NOTICES_AS_POLICY_SIGNAL`	`ERCOT_MARKET_NOTICE_A122325_03`	p.1, M-A122325-03 (Jan 30, 2026): draft framework posted for Feb 3 workshop; feedback deadline Feb 5; sets up Feb 12 second workshop; framework to be filed at Feb 20 PUC Open Meeting.	`batch_study` `governance_dependency` `policy_update` `market_notice`	`load_mw_total>=75 (300)`
`MARKET_NOTICE_002_ERCOT_NOTICES_A122325_05_LATEST`	`ERCOT_MARKET_NOTICE_A122325_05`	p.1, M-A122325-05 (Feb 17, 2026): "PUC recently provided guidance to ERCOT and stakeholders to engage in an expedited process to develop revision requests that create a new Batch Zero study for consideration at the June 1, 2026 ERCOT Board meeting."	`batch_study` `governance_dependency` `policy_update` `market_notice` `timeline_risk`	`load_mw_total>=75 (300)`

Risk Details

qualitative, deterministic v0

Status

rule_driven_v0

Study results floor date

n/a (unanchored)

Earliest COD quarter

n/a

Timeline estimate status

unanchored

Upgrade exposure

low

Operational exposure

high

How timeline signals are computed

⚠ Timeline floor unanchored

Provide batch_zero_eligible to anchor the study results floor date to a specific ERCOT batch calendar.

Score-derived directional signals (not calendar-anchored)

upgrade_score 1.0wait_score 58.0ops_score 10.0

Caveats

Medium upgrade or elevated wait pressure; timeline likely 12–24 months minimum once batch placement is known
batch_zero_eligible not provided; study floor not calculable — provide batch qualification status to anchor timeline
Without batch anchor, upgrade_score and wait_score directional signals are the only available indicators
upgrade_score=1 (low upgrade exposure); wait_score=58

Audit trail

See “Risk trace (raw JSON)” for per-rule tag contributions, and “Evidence” for rule_id → doc_id/loc.

satisfied 55 missing 3 not_satisfied 0 unknown 4 heuristics 3 evidence items 84

Evidence (grouped + filterable)

rule_id	doc_id	loc	tags
`ERCOT_LLI_INTAKE_REQUIRED_DOCS`	`ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST`	p.1, Instructions ("All fields must be completed unless otherwise noted")	`data_completeness` `process_latency`
`PG9_001_LLIS_APPLICABILITY_SUBJECT_TO_LLIS`	`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	p.129, Section 9.2.1 ("following criteria shall be subject to the Large Load Interconnection Study (LLIS)")	`process_trigger`
`LL_QA_003_TSP_INITIATION`	`ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA`	p.6, "initiate the Large Load Interconnection Process?"	`intake_gate` `process_latency`
`LL_QA_004_LOAD_COMMISSIONING_PLAN`	`ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA`	p.7, Planning Guide Section 9.2.2	`commissioning_plan` `data_completeness` `timeline_dependency`
`LL_QA_005_APPLICATION_FEE`	`ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA`	p.7, Planning Guide Section 9.2.2 fee requirement	`fee_requirement` `process_latency`
`PG9_005_LLIS_PREINIT_PRELIM_LCP_REQUIRED`	`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	p.129, Section 9.2.2(1)(b) ("Submission of a preliminary Load Commissioning Plan (LCP)")	`commissioning_plan` `data_completeness` `process_latency`
`PG9_006_LLIS_PREINIT_WRITTEN_ACK_REQUIRED`	`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	p.129, Section 9.2.2(1)(c) ("Written acknowledgement from the Interconnecting Large Load Entity (ILLE)")	`data_completeness` `process_latency` `re_study`
`PG9_007_LLIS_PREINIT_FORMAL_REQUEST_REQUIRED`	`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	p.129, Section 9.2.2(1)(d) ("A formal request to initiate the LLIS process")	`data_completeness` `intake_gate` `process_latency`
`PG9_008_LLIS_PREINIT_APPLICATION_FEE_REQUIRED`	`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	p.130, Section 9.2.2(1)(e) ("Payment of the LLIS Application Fee")	`data_completeness` `fee_requirement` `process_latency`
`PG9_025_LLIS_PREINIT_STUDY_DATA_PACKAGE_REQUIRED`	`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	p.129, Section 9.2.2(1)(a) ("Submission of all information, including but not limited to, data required by the lead Transmission Service Provider (TSP) to perform steady state, short circuit, motor start, stability analyses")	`data_completeness` `process_latency` `study_dependency`
`PG9_002_LLIS_APPLICABILITY_NEW_LARGE_LOAD`	`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	p.129, Section 9.2.1(a) ("A new Large Load;")	`process_trigger`
`PG9_003_LLIS_APPLICABILITY_MOD_INCREASE_AGGREGATE_PEAK`	`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	p.129, Section 9.2.1(b) ("increases the aggregate peak")	`modification_trigger` `process_trigger`
`PG9_004_LLIS_APPLICABILITY_POI_CHANGE_OR_ADD`	`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	p.129, Section 9.2.1(c) ("changes or adds a Point of")	`modification_trigger` `process_trigger`
`LL_QA_002_SECTION9_APPLICABILITY`	`ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA`	p.4, Section 9.2.1 Applicability	`modification_trigger` `process_trigger`
`PG9_013_LCP_SECTION_9_2_4`	`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	p.131, Section 9.2.4 ("9.2.4 Load Commissioning Plan")	`commissioning_plan` `timeline_dependency`
`PUCT_001_PROJECT_58481_RULEMAKING_DEPENDENCY`	`PUCT_PROJECT_58481_LARGE_LOAD`	p.1, PUCT Project No. 58481, docket filing (Sierra Club comments on 2nd Discussion Draft, 16 TAC §25.194, Jan 9 2026 workshop); rulemaking ongoing	`compliance_dependency` `governance_dependency` `puct_rule_pending` `timeline_dependency`
`PUCT_002_REGULATORY_CHANGE_MAY_ALTER_LLIS_OBLIGATIONS`	`PUCT_PROJECT_58481_LARGE_LOAD`	p.1-3, PUCT Project No. 58481, docket (16 TAC §25.194) — rulemaking establishing new interconnection standards for large loads; corroborated by ERCOT Q&A Rev.12.15.25 ("PUC is in the process of establishing new interconnection standards for large loads in Project No. 58481")	`compliance_dependency` `process_latency` `puct_rule_pending` `timeline_risk`
`POLICY_001_TEXAS_TRIBUNE_DATA_CENTER_ERCOT_NEW_FRAMEWORK`	`ERCOT_MARKET_NOTICE_A122325_01`	p.1, M-A122325-01 (context: public reporting of ERCOT shift to data-center batch study framework)	`batch_study` `governance_dependency` `queue_density` `timeline_risk`
`LLI_INTAKE_LOAD_INFORMATION_FORM_V1_REQUIRED`	`ERCOT_LLI_LOAD_INFORMATION_FORM_V1`	Load Information Form V1 (effective Dec 15, 2025); linked from ERCOT LLI page	`data_completeness` `intake_requirement` `process_latency`
`LLI_COMMUNICATION_INSTRUCTIONS_SUBMISSION_CHANNELS`	`ERCOT_LLI_INSTRUCTIONS_COMMUNICATION`	Instructions for Communication of Large Load Information (effective Dec 15, 2025)	`data_completeness` `intake_requirement` `process_latency`
`PGRR_136_STUDY_SCOPE_DOCUMENTATION_PENDING`	`ERCOT_PGRR_PENDING_LARGE_LOAD_TRACKER`	PGRR136: Large Load Interconnection Study Scope Documentation (pending at ROS as of 2026-02-28)	`governance_dependency` `process_latency` `regulatory_change` `study_scope`
`PGRR_138_STUDY_REVIEW_APPROVAL_PROCESS_PENDING`	`ERCOT_PGRR_PENDING_LARGE_LOAD_TRACKER`	PGRR138: Large Load Interconnection Study Review and Approval Process (pending at ROS as of 2026-02-28)	`governance_dependency` `process_latency` `regulatory_change` `study_scope` `timeline_risk`
`PGRR_141_SUBSTANTIATED_LOAD_REFORM_PENDING`	`ERCOT_PGRR_PENDING_LARGE_LOAD_TRACKER`	PGRR141: Large Load Interconnection Study Reform for Substantiated Load (pending at ROS as of 2026-02-28)	`governance_dependency` `queue_position` `regulatory_change` `study_scope` `timeline_risk`
`PGRR_134_DISPATCHABLE_LOAD_REFORM_PENDING`	`ERCOT_PGRR_PENDING_LARGE_LOAD_TRACKER`	PGRR134: Interconnection Studies Reform for Dispatchable Loads (pending at ROS as of 2026-02-28)	`curtailment` `governance_dependency` `process_latency` `regulatory_change` `study_scope`
`PGRR_144_DYNAMIC_MODEL_LARGE_ELECTRONIC_LOADS_PENDING`	`ERCOT_PGRR_PENDING_LARGE_LOAD_TRACKER`	PGRR144: Dynamic Model Submission and Review Requirements for Large Loads including Large Electronic Loads (pending at ROS as of 2026-02-28)	`dwg_survey` `dynamic_model` `governance_dependency` `regulatory_change` `timeline_risk`
`LL_QA_001_LARGE_LOAD_DEFINITION`	`ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA`	p.3, "How does ERCOT define a large load?"	`process_trigger`
`PG9_028_LCP_PHASES_REQUIRED_IF_PHASED_PLAN`	`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	p.131, Section 9.2.4(1) ("The LCP must specify the load increments and timeline by which the ILLE intends to increase peak Demand")	`commissioning_plan` `data_completeness` `process_latency` `timeline_dependency`
`ONC_003_LOAD_PROJECTION`	`ONCOR_STD_520_106`	Section 4.1.8, p.6	`data_completeness` `process_latency` `timeline_dependency`
`ONC_004_ONE_LINE_DIAGRAM`	`ONCOR_STD_520_106`	Section 4.1.6, p.6	`data_completeness` `engineering_review` `process_latency`
`LL_QA_006_MATERIAL_CHANGE`	`ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA`	p.7, Planning Guide Section 9.2.3	`re_study` `timeline_risk`
`LL_QA_010_RESTUDY_QUEUE`	`ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA`	p.10, "studies of other nearby large"	`queue_density` `re_study` `timeline_risk`
`PG9_011_PROJECT_INFO_UPDATE_10_BUSINESS_DAYS`	`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	p.130, Section 9.2.3 ("within ten Business Days")	`process_latency` `re_study` `timeline_risk`
`PG9_012_DYNAMIC_MODEL_CHANGE_IMPACTS_LLIS`	`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	p.130, Section 9.2.3 ("dynamic model information used in the LLIS stability study")	`dynamic_stability` `re_study` `study_dependency` `timeline_risk`
`PG9_026_MATERIAL_CHANGE_NOTIFY_LEAD_TSP`	`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	p.130, Section 9.2.3(2) ("The ILLE shall notify the lead TSP if a change to the load composition, technology, or parameters occurs")	`process_latency` `re_study` `timeline_risk`
`PG9_027_NEW_STABILITY_STUDY_DETERMINATION_IF_SUBSTANTIAL_CHANGE`	`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	p.130, Section 9.2.3(2) ("the lead TSP shall determine whether a new stability study is required and provide a written explanation")	`dynamic_stability` `re_study` `study_dependency` `timeline_risk`
`RESTUDY_001_MATERIAL_CHANGE_UNDER_BATCH_CYCLE`	`ERCOT_LLI_BATCH_STUDY_PPT_20260122`	Slide 5-7, ERCOT-Large-Load-Batch-Studies-LLWG_01222026.pptx (Slide 5: Transitional Batch Zero and restudy context; Slide 7: TSP role changes impacting in-progress LLI requests during batch transition)	`batch_study` `queue_dependency` `re_study` `restudy_risk` `timeline_risk`
`RESTUDY_002_QUEUE_DISRUPTION_NEARBY_MUST_STUDY`	`ERCOT_MARKET_NOTICE_A122325_01`	p.1, M-A122325-01 – LONG DESCRIPTION: structural challenges including "coordination across TSPs, repeated restudies, and a growing backlog." Also corroborated by Q&A Rev.12.15.25 p.10: "A common reason re-studies are needed is that another large load customer in the same area becomes a must-study load."	`batch_study` `queue_density` `restudy_risk` `study_dependency` `timeline_risk`
`BATCH_001_BATCH_STUDY_PROCESS_PENDING_POLICY`	`ERCOT_LLI_BATCH_STUDY_WORKSHOP_20260203`	ERCOT-Large-Load-Batch-Study-Workshop-02032026.pptx, Slide 5 (background) and Slide 8 (batch process overview); PUCT Open Meeting presentation planned for 2026-02-20.	`batch_study` `governance_dependency` `study_dependency` `timeline_risk`
`LL_QA_007_REQUIRED_STUDIES`	`ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA`	p.8–9, "What types of reliability studies are required?"	`dynamic_stability` `short_circuit` `steady_state` `study_dependency`
`LL_QA_008_SSO_REQUIRED`	`ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA`	p.8, "Subsynchronous Oscillation study (SSO study)"	`dynamic_study` `energization_gate` `sso` `study_dependency`
`ONC_002_VOLTAGE_AVAILABILITY`	`ONCOR_STD_520_106`	Section 3.4.1, p.3	`voltage_selection_risk`
`ONCOR_520_106_SYSTEM_PROTECTION_REQUIREMENTS`	`ONCOR_STD_520_106`	p.8, Sec 6.0 "System Protection Requirements" (protection requirements depend on POD/location/line protection)	`protection` `upgrade_exposure`
`ONC_001_TRANSMISSION_VOLTAGE_SCOPE`	`ONCOR_STD_520_106`	Section 1.1, p.1	`transmission_scope`
`ONC_005_FAULT_INTERRUPT_RATING`	`ONCOR_STD_520_106`	Section 5.2.1, p.7	`protection` `short_circuit` `upgrade_exposure`
`ONC_006_DUAL_FAULT_SENSING_CLOSE`	`ONCOR_STD_520_106`	Section 6.1.1, p.8	`protection` `upgrade_exposure`
`ONC_007_6_CYCLE_CLEARING`	`ONCOR_STD_520_106`	Section 6.1.1, p.8	`protection` `upgrade_exposure`
`ONC_008_3_CYCLE_BREAKER`	`ONCOR_STD_520_106`	Section 6.1.2, p.11	`protection` `upgrade_exposure`
`ONC_009_REVENUE_METERING`	`ONCOR_STD_520_106`	Section 3.6.1, p.3–4	`metering_requirement`
`ONC_011_LOAD_REMOVAL_RIGHT`	`ONCOR_STD_520_106`	Section 7.1.3, p.22	`curtailment_risk` `operational_constraint`
`PG9_029_CANCELLATION_RISK_IF_SECTION_9_5_NOT_SATISFIED_180_DAYS_AGREEMENTS`	`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	p.138, Section 9.4(9) ("If the requirements of Section 9.5, have not been satisfied within 180 days after the communication of the completion of the LLIS")	`cancellation_risk` `process_latency` `timeline_risk`
`PG9_029B_CANCELLATION_RISK_IF_SECTION_9_5_NOT_SATISFIED_180_DAYS_FINANCIAL_SECURITY`	`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	p.138, Section 9.4(9) ("If the requirements of Section 9.5, have not been satisfied within 180 days after the communication of the completion of the LLIS")	`cancellation_risk` `financial_security` `process_latency` `timeline_risk`
`LLI_EN_001_WRITTEN_APPROVAL_REQUIRED`	`ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST`	p.3, "may not proceed until written approval"	`energization_gate` `process_latency`
`LLI_EN_003_LLIS_COMPLETE`	`ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST`	p.2, "All studies required per the Large Load Interconnection Study process have been completed and approved"	`energization_gate` `study_dependency`
`LLI_EN_004_SSO_APPLICABILITY`	`ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST`	p.2, "Is a SSO study required for this Large Load interconnection?"	`data_completeness` `energization_gate` `study_dependency`
`LLI_EN_004_SSO_COMPLETE`	`ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST`	p.2, "The SSO study is complete and all required mitigation is in place"	`dynamic_stability` `energization_gate` `sso` `study_dependency`
`LLI_EN_007_MODEL_CONSISTENCY`	`ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST`	p.2, "no changes have been made to the load composition"	`dynamic_stability` `re_study` `timeline_risk`
`LLI_EN_012_DME_APPLICABILITY`	`ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST`	p.2, "Disturbance Monitoring Equipment (DME) is required"	`data_completeness` `energization_gate` `process_latency`
`LL_QA_013_RIDE_THROUGH`	`ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA`	p.14–15, "voltage and frequency ride-through risks"	`curtailment_risk` `dynamic_stability` `operational_constraint`
`PG9_021_ENERGIZATION_SSO_COMPLETE_IF_REQUIRED`	`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	p.141, Section 9.6(d) ("Subsynchronous Oscillation (SSO)")	`dynamic_stability` `energization_gate` `sso` `study_dependency`
`PG9_022_ENERGIZATION_CURRENT_LCP_REQUIRED`	`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	p.141, Section 9.6(e) ("Submission of a current Load Commissioning Plan (LCP)")	`commissioning_plan` `data_completeness` `energization_gate` `process_latency`
`PG9_023_LLIS_COMPLETION_COMMUNICATED`	`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	p.100, ("ERCOT has communicated the completion of the LLIS")	`energization_gate` `process_latency` `study_dependency`
`PG9_030_365_DAY_INITIAL_ENERGIZATION_RESTUDY_OPINION`	`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	p.138, Section 9.4(10) ("within 365 days after the Initial Energization date identified in the LLIS study report, the lead TSP shall provide an opinion to ERCOT on whether any of the completed LLIS elements require restudy")	`re_study` `timeline_risk`
`PUCT_003_RULEMAKING_MAY_AFFECT_ENERGIZATION_REQUIREMENTS`	`PUCT_PROJECT_58481_LARGE_LOAD`	p.1, PUCT Project No. 58481, docket (Sierra Club comments reference 50% backup generation threshold, SB 6 compliance, and large load qualification standards under 16 TAC §25.194)	`compliance_dependency` `energization_gate` `process_latency` `puct_rule_pending`
`LL_QA_014_365_DAY_RULE`	`ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA`	p.15, Planning Guide Section 9.4(10)	`re_study` `timeline_risk`
`LL_QA_015_CONSUMPTION_LIMIT`	`ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA`	p.16, Planning Guide Sections 9.2.2 & 9.6	`commissioning_limit` `operational_constraint` `timeline_risk`
`LLI_EN_008_NOTIFY_CHANGES`	`ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST`	p.2, "obligation to notify the interconnecting TSP of changes"	`re_study` `timeline_risk`
`LLI_EN_009_CONSUMPTION_LIMIT`	`ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST`	p.2, "Maintain Load consumption at or below"	`commissioning_limit` `operational_constraint`
`LLI_EN_010_PEAK_INCREASE_FORM`	`ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST`	p.3, "any request to increase the amount of peak Demand"	`modification_trigger` `re_study` `timeline_risk`
`PG9_014_LCP_UPDATE_AFTER_LLIS_COMPLETION`	`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	p.131, Section 9.2.4(2) ("Upon the completion of the LLIS")	`commissioning_plan` `data_completeness` `process_latency`
`PG9_015_LCP_UPDATE_AFTER_AGREEMENTS_EXECUTED`	`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	p.131, Section 9.2.4(3) ("Upon the execution of any required agreements")	`commissioning_plan` `timeline_dependency`
`PG9_033_REQUIRED_INTERCONNECTION_EQUIPMENT_BREAKERS_TRANSMISSION_NOT_COLOCATED`	`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	p.131, Section 9.2.5(1) ("interconnected at transmission voltage"; "must have ... breakers capable of interrupting fault current"; "remote control" by TO)	`process_latency` `protection` `upgrade_exposure`
`PG9_016_STEADY_STATE_ANALYSIS_ELEMENT`	`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	p.135, Section 9.3.4.1 ("9.3.4.1 Steady-State Analysis")	`steady_state` `study_dependency`
`PG9_017_SYSTEM_PROTECTION_SHORT_CIRCUIT_ELEMENT`	`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	p.136, Section 9.3.4.2 ("System Protection (Short-Circuit) Analysis")	`protection` `short_circuit` `study_dependency`
`PG9_018_DYNAMIC_TRANSIENT_STABILITY_ELEMENT`	`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	p.136, Section 9.3.4.3 ("Dynamic and Transient Stability Analysis")	`dynamic_stability` `study_dependency`
`BATCH_004_WORKSHOP_PROCESS_ONGOING`	`ERCOT_LLI_BATCH_STUDY_WORKSHOP_20260203`	ERCOT-Large-Load-Batch-Study-Workshop-02032026.pptx, Slide 2 (disclaimer), Slide 47-48 (next steps); PUCT Open Meeting 2026-02-20.	`batch_study` `governance_dependency` `policy_update` `timeline_dependency`
`QA_REV1215_BATCH_STUDY_REFERENCE_PROCESS`	`ERCOT_MARKET_NOTICE_A122325_01`	p.1, M-A122325-01 (batch study process announcement, Dec 23 2025; PGRR115 already insufficient; batch study as successor framework)	`batch_study` `policy_update` `process_latency`
`MARKET_NOTICE_001_ERCOT_NOTICES_AS_POLICY_SIGNAL`	`ERCOT_MARKET_NOTICE_A122325_03`	p.1, M-A122325-03 (Jan 30, 2026): draft framework posted for Feb 3 workshop; feedback deadline Feb 5; sets up Feb 12 second workshop; framework to be filed at Feb 20 PUC Open Meeting.	`batch_study` `governance_dependency` `market_notice` `policy_update`
`MARKET_NOTICE_002_ERCOT_NOTICES_A122325_05_LATEST`	`ERCOT_MARKET_NOTICE_A122325_05`	p.1, M-A122325-05 (Feb 17, 2026): "PUC recently provided guidance to ERCOT and stakeholders to engage in an expedited process to develop revision requests that create a new Batch Zero study for consideration at the June 1, 2026 ERCOT Board meeting."	`batch_study` `governance_dependency` `market_notice` `policy_update` `timeline_risk`
`HEUR_LOAD_MW_GTE_300`	`NON_CITED_HEURISTIC`	non-cited heuristic: large load (MW total ≥ 300) increases upgrade exposure pressure	`mw_threshold` `non_cited_heuristic` `upgrade_exposure`
`HEUR_PHASED_PLAN_REDUCES_UPGRADE_PRESSURE`	`NON_CITED_HEURISTIC`	non-cited heuristic: phased energization plan can reduce upgrade exposure pressure in screening	`non_cited_heuristic` `phased_plan` `upgrade_exposure`
`HEUR_MISSING_INPUTS_PRESENT_INCREASES_WAIT_PRESSURE`	`NON_CITED_HEURISTIC`	non-cited heuristic: missing inputs increase process waiting/latency pressure	`data_completeness` `non_cited_heuristic` `process_latency`
`CTX_queue_density`	`CONTEXT_SNAPSHOT`	as_of=2026-02-13; source=pilot snapshot (manual); Example context input for v0 demo	`queue_density`
`CTX_queue_dependency`	`CONTEXT_SNAPSHOT`	as_of=2026-02-13; source=pilot snapshot (manual)	`queue_dependency`
`CTX_must_study`	`CONTEXT_SNAPSHOT`	as_of=2026-02-13; source=pilot snapshot (manual)	`must_study`

CONTEXT_SNAPSHOT (3)

rule_id	loc	tags
`CTX_must_study`	as_of=2026-02-13; source=pilot snapshot (manual)	`must_study`
`CTX_queue_density`	as_of=2026-02-13; source=pilot snapshot (manual); Example context input for v0 demo	`queue_density`
`CTX_queue_dependency`	as_of=2026-02-13; source=pilot snapshot (manual)	`queue_dependency`

ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA (12)

rule_id	loc	tags
`LL_QA_001_LARGE_LOAD_DEFINITION`	p.3, "How does ERCOT define a large load?"	`process_trigger`
`LL_QA_002_SECTION9_APPLICABILITY`	p.4, Section 9.2.1 Applicability	`modification_trigger` `process_trigger`
`LL_QA_003_TSP_INITIATION`	p.6, "initiate the Large Load Interconnection Process?"	`intake_gate` `process_latency`
`LL_QA_004_LOAD_COMMISSIONING_PLAN`	p.7, Planning Guide Section 9.2.2	`commissioning_plan` `data_completeness` `timeline_dependency`
`LL_QA_005_APPLICATION_FEE`	p.7, Planning Guide Section 9.2.2 fee requirement	`fee_requirement` `process_latency`
`LL_QA_006_MATERIAL_CHANGE`	p.7, Planning Guide Section 9.2.3	`re_study` `timeline_risk`
`LL_QA_007_REQUIRED_STUDIES`	p.8–9, "What types of reliability studies are required?"	`dynamic_stability` `short_circuit` `steady_state` `study_dependency`
`LL_QA_008_SSO_REQUIRED`	p.8, "Subsynchronous Oscillation study (SSO study)"	`dynamic_study` `energization_gate` `sso` `study_dependency`
`LL_QA_010_RESTUDY_QUEUE`	p.10, "studies of other nearby large"	`queue_density` `re_study` `timeline_risk`
`LL_QA_013_RIDE_THROUGH`	p.14–15, "voltage and frequency ride-through risks"	`curtailment_risk` `dynamic_stability` `operational_constraint`
`LL_QA_014_365_DAY_RULE`	p.15, Planning Guide Section 9.4(10)	`re_study` `timeline_risk`
`LL_QA_015_CONSUMPTION_LIMIT`	p.16, Planning Guide Sections 9.2.2 & 9.6	`commissioning_limit` `operational_constraint` `timeline_risk`

ERCOT_LLI_BATCH_STUDY_PPT_20260122 (1)

rule_id	loc	tags
`RESTUDY_001_MATERIAL_CHANGE_UNDER_BATCH_CYCLE`	Slide 5-7, ERCOT-Large-Load-Batch-Studies-LLWG_01222026.pptx (Slide 5: Transitional Batch Zero and restudy context; Slide 7: TSP role changes impacting in-progress LLI requests during batch transition)	`batch_study` `queue_dependency` `re_study` `restudy_risk` `timeline_risk`

ERCOT_LLI_BATCH_STUDY_WORKSHOP_20260203 (2)

rule_id	loc	tags
`BATCH_001_BATCH_STUDY_PROCESS_PENDING_POLICY`	ERCOT-Large-Load-Batch-Study-Workshop-02032026.pptx, Slide 5 (background) and Slide 8 (batch process overview); PUCT Open Meeting presentation planned for 2026-02-20.	`batch_study` `governance_dependency` `study_dependency` `timeline_risk`
`BATCH_004_WORKSHOP_PROCESS_ONGOING`	ERCOT-Large-Load-Batch-Study-Workshop-02032026.pptx, Slide 2 (disclaimer), Slide 47-48 (next steps); PUCT Open Meeting 2026-02-20.	`batch_study` `governance_dependency` `policy_update` `timeline_dependency`

ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST (10)

rule_id	loc	tags
`ERCOT_LLI_INTAKE_REQUIRED_DOCS`	p.1, Instructions ("All fields must be completed unless otherwise noted")	`data_completeness` `process_latency`
`LLI_EN_001_WRITTEN_APPROVAL_REQUIRED`	p.3, "may not proceed until written approval"	`energization_gate` `process_latency`
`LLI_EN_003_LLIS_COMPLETE`	p.2, "All studies required per the Large Load Interconnection Study process have been completed and approved"	`energization_gate` `study_dependency`
`LLI_EN_004_SSO_APPLICABILITY`	p.2, "Is a SSO study required for this Large Load interconnection?"	`data_completeness` `energization_gate` `study_dependency`
`LLI_EN_004_SSO_COMPLETE`	p.2, "The SSO study is complete and all required mitigation is in place"	`dynamic_stability` `energization_gate` `sso` `study_dependency`
`LLI_EN_007_MODEL_CONSISTENCY`	p.2, "no changes have been made to the load composition"	`dynamic_stability` `re_study` `timeline_risk`
`LLI_EN_008_NOTIFY_CHANGES`	p.2, "obligation to notify the interconnecting TSP of changes"	`re_study` `timeline_risk`
`LLI_EN_009_CONSUMPTION_LIMIT`	p.2, "Maintain Load consumption at or below"	`commissioning_limit` `operational_constraint`
`LLI_EN_010_PEAK_INCREASE_FORM`	p.3, "any request to increase the amount of peak Demand"	`modification_trigger` `re_study` `timeline_risk`
`LLI_EN_012_DME_APPLICABILITY`	p.2, "Disturbance Monitoring Equipment (DME) is required"	`data_completeness` `energization_gate` `process_latency`

ERCOT_LLI_INSTRUCTIONS_COMMUNICATION (1)

rule_id	loc	tags
`LLI_COMMUNICATION_INSTRUCTIONS_SUBMISSION_CHANNELS`	Instructions for Communication of Large Load Information (effective Dec 15, 2025)	`data_completeness` `intake_requirement` `process_latency`

ERCOT_LLI_LOAD_INFORMATION_FORM_V1 (1)

rule_id	loc	tags
`LLI_INTAKE_LOAD_INFORMATION_FORM_V1_REQUIRED`	Load Information Form V1 (effective Dec 15, 2025); linked from ERCOT LLI page	`data_completeness` `intake_requirement` `process_latency`

ERCOT_MARKET_NOTICE_A122325_01 (3)

rule_id	loc	tags
`POLICY_001_TEXAS_TRIBUNE_DATA_CENTER_ERCOT_NEW_FRAMEWORK`	p.1, M-A122325-01 (context: public reporting of ERCOT shift to data-center batch study framework)	`batch_study` `governance_dependency` `queue_density` `timeline_risk`
`QA_REV1215_BATCH_STUDY_REFERENCE_PROCESS`	p.1, M-A122325-01 (batch study process announcement, Dec 23 2025; PGRR115 already insufficient; batch study as successor framework)	`batch_study` `policy_update` `process_latency`
`RESTUDY_002_QUEUE_DISRUPTION_NEARBY_MUST_STUDY`	p.1, M-A122325-01 – LONG DESCRIPTION: structural challenges including "coordination across TSPs, repeated restudies, and a growing backlog." Also corroborated by Q&A Rev.12.15.25 p.10: "A common reason re-studies are needed is that another large load customer in the same area becomes a must-study load."	`batch_study` `queue_density` `restudy_risk` `study_dependency` `timeline_risk`

ERCOT_MARKET_NOTICE_A122325_03 (1)

rule_id	loc	tags
`MARKET_NOTICE_001_ERCOT_NOTICES_AS_POLICY_SIGNAL`	p.1, M-A122325-03 (Jan 30, 2026): draft framework posted for Feb 3 workshop; feedback deadline Feb 5; sets up Feb 12 second workshop; framework to be filed at Feb 20 PUC Open Meeting.	`batch_study` `governance_dependency` `market_notice` `policy_update`

ERCOT_MARKET_NOTICE_A122325_05 (1)

rule_id	loc	tags
`MARKET_NOTICE_002_ERCOT_NOTICES_A122325_05_LATEST`	p.1, M-A122325-05 (Feb 17, 2026): "PUC recently provided guidance to ERCOT and stakeholders to engage in an expedited process to develop revision requests that create a new Batch Zero study for consideration at the June 1, 2026 ERCOT Board meeting."	`batch_study` `governance_dependency` `market_notice` `policy_update` `timeline_risk`

ERCOT_PGRR_PENDING_LARGE_LOAD_TRACKER (5)

rule_id	loc	tags
`PGRR_134_DISPATCHABLE_LOAD_REFORM_PENDING`	PGRR134: Interconnection Studies Reform for Dispatchable Loads (pending at ROS as of 2026-02-28)	`curtailment` `governance_dependency` `process_latency` `regulatory_change` `study_scope`
`PGRR_136_STUDY_SCOPE_DOCUMENTATION_PENDING`	PGRR136: Large Load Interconnection Study Scope Documentation (pending at ROS as of 2026-02-28)	`governance_dependency` `process_latency` `regulatory_change` `study_scope`
`PGRR_138_STUDY_REVIEW_APPROVAL_PROCESS_PENDING`	PGRR138: Large Load Interconnection Study Review and Approval Process (pending at ROS as of 2026-02-28)	`governance_dependency` `process_latency` `regulatory_change` `study_scope` `timeline_risk`
`PGRR_141_SUBSTANTIATED_LOAD_REFORM_PENDING`	PGRR141: Large Load Interconnection Study Reform for Substantiated Load (pending at ROS as of 2026-02-28)	`governance_dependency` `queue_position` `regulatory_change` `study_scope` `timeline_risk`
`PGRR_144_DYNAMIC_MODEL_LARGE_ELECTRONIC_LOADS_PENDING`	PGRR144: Dynamic Model Submission and Review Requirements for Large Loads including Large Electronic Loads (pending at ROS as of 2026-02-28)	`dwg_survey` `dynamic_model` `governance_dependency` `regulatory_change` `timeline_risk`

ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE (27)

rule_id	loc	tags
`PG9_001_LLIS_APPLICABILITY_SUBJECT_TO_LLIS`	p.129, Section 9.2.1 ("following criteria shall be subject to the Large Load Interconnection Study (LLIS)")	`process_trigger`
`PG9_002_LLIS_APPLICABILITY_NEW_LARGE_LOAD`	p.129, Section 9.2.1(a) ("A new Large Load;")	`process_trigger`
`PG9_003_LLIS_APPLICABILITY_MOD_INCREASE_AGGREGATE_PEAK`	p.129, Section 9.2.1(b) ("increases the aggregate peak")	`modification_trigger` `process_trigger`
`PG9_004_LLIS_APPLICABILITY_POI_CHANGE_OR_ADD`	p.129, Section 9.2.1(c) ("changes or adds a Point of")	`modification_trigger` `process_trigger`
`PG9_005_LLIS_PREINIT_PRELIM_LCP_REQUIRED`	p.129, Section 9.2.2(1)(b) ("Submission of a preliminary Load Commissioning Plan (LCP)")	`commissioning_plan` `data_completeness` `process_latency`
`PG9_006_LLIS_PREINIT_WRITTEN_ACK_REQUIRED`	p.129, Section 9.2.2(1)(c) ("Written acknowledgement from the Interconnecting Large Load Entity (ILLE)")	`data_completeness` `process_latency` `re_study`
`PG9_007_LLIS_PREINIT_FORMAL_REQUEST_REQUIRED`	p.129, Section 9.2.2(1)(d) ("A formal request to initiate the LLIS process")	`data_completeness` `intake_gate` `process_latency`
`PG9_008_LLIS_PREINIT_APPLICATION_FEE_REQUIRED`	p.130, Section 9.2.2(1)(e) ("Payment of the LLIS Application Fee")	`data_completeness` `fee_requirement` `process_latency`
`PG9_011_PROJECT_INFO_UPDATE_10_BUSINESS_DAYS`	p.130, Section 9.2.3 ("within ten Business Days")	`process_latency` `re_study` `timeline_risk`
`PG9_012_DYNAMIC_MODEL_CHANGE_IMPACTS_LLIS`	p.130, Section 9.2.3 ("dynamic model information used in the LLIS stability study")	`dynamic_stability` `re_study` `study_dependency` `timeline_risk`
`PG9_013_LCP_SECTION_9_2_4`	p.131, Section 9.2.4 ("9.2.4 Load Commissioning Plan")	`commissioning_plan` `timeline_dependency`
`PG9_014_LCP_UPDATE_AFTER_LLIS_COMPLETION`	p.131, Section 9.2.4(2) ("Upon the completion of the LLIS")	`commissioning_plan` `data_completeness` `process_latency`
`PG9_015_LCP_UPDATE_AFTER_AGREEMENTS_EXECUTED`	p.131, Section 9.2.4(3) ("Upon the execution of any required agreements")	`commissioning_plan` `timeline_dependency`
`PG9_016_STEADY_STATE_ANALYSIS_ELEMENT`	p.135, Section 9.3.4.1 ("9.3.4.1 Steady-State Analysis")	`steady_state` `study_dependency`
`PG9_017_SYSTEM_PROTECTION_SHORT_CIRCUIT_ELEMENT`	p.136, Section 9.3.4.2 ("System Protection (Short-Circuit) Analysis")	`protection` `short_circuit` `study_dependency`
`PG9_018_DYNAMIC_TRANSIENT_STABILITY_ELEMENT`	p.136, Section 9.3.4.3 ("Dynamic and Transient Stability Analysis")	`dynamic_stability` `study_dependency`
`PG9_021_ENERGIZATION_SSO_COMPLETE_IF_REQUIRED`	p.141, Section 9.6(d) ("Subsynchronous Oscillation (SSO)")	`dynamic_stability` `energization_gate` `sso` `study_dependency`
`PG9_022_ENERGIZATION_CURRENT_LCP_REQUIRED`	p.141, Section 9.6(e) ("Submission of a current Load Commissioning Plan (LCP)")	`commissioning_plan` `data_completeness` `energization_gate` `process_latency`
`PG9_023_LLIS_COMPLETION_COMMUNICATED`	p.100, ("ERCOT has communicated the completion of the LLIS")	`energization_gate` `process_latency` `study_dependency`
`PG9_025_LLIS_PREINIT_STUDY_DATA_PACKAGE_REQUIRED`	p.129, Section 9.2.2(1)(a) ("Submission of all information, including but not limited to, data required by the lead Transmission Service Provider (TSP) to perform steady state, short circuit, motor start, stability analyses")	`data_completeness` `process_latency` `study_dependency`
`PG9_026_MATERIAL_CHANGE_NOTIFY_LEAD_TSP`	p.130, Section 9.2.3(2) ("The ILLE shall notify the lead TSP if a change to the load composition, technology, or parameters occurs")	`process_latency` `re_study` `timeline_risk`
`PG9_027_NEW_STABILITY_STUDY_DETERMINATION_IF_SUBSTANTIAL_CHANGE`	p.130, Section 9.2.3(2) ("the lead TSP shall determine whether a new stability study is required and provide a written explanation")	`dynamic_stability` `re_study` `study_dependency` `timeline_risk`
`PG9_028_LCP_PHASES_REQUIRED_IF_PHASED_PLAN`	p.131, Section 9.2.4(1) ("The LCP must specify the load increments and timeline by which the ILLE intends to increase peak Demand")	`commissioning_plan` `data_completeness` `process_latency` `timeline_dependency`
`PG9_029B_CANCELLATION_RISK_IF_SECTION_9_5_NOT_SATISFIED_180_DAYS_FINANCIAL_SECURITY`	p.138, Section 9.4(9) ("If the requirements of Section 9.5, have not been satisfied within 180 days after the communication of the completion of the LLIS")	`cancellation_risk` `financial_security` `process_latency` `timeline_risk`
`PG9_029_CANCELLATION_RISK_IF_SECTION_9_5_NOT_SATISFIED_180_DAYS_AGREEMENTS`	p.138, Section 9.4(9) ("If the requirements of Section 9.5, have not been satisfied within 180 days after the communication of the completion of the LLIS")	`cancellation_risk` `process_latency` `timeline_risk`
`PG9_030_365_DAY_INITIAL_ENERGIZATION_RESTUDY_OPINION`	p.138, Section 9.4(10) ("within 365 days after the Initial Energization date identified in the LLIS study report, the lead TSP shall provide an opinion to ERCOT on whether any of the completed LLIS elements require restudy")	`re_study` `timeline_risk`
`PG9_033_REQUIRED_INTERCONNECTION_EQUIPMENT_BREAKERS_TRANSMISSION_NOT_COLOCATED`	p.131, Section 9.2.5(1) ("interconnected at transmission voltage"; "must have ... breakers capable of interrupting fault current"; "remote control" by TO)	`process_latency` `protection` `upgrade_exposure`

NON_CITED_HEURISTIC (3)

rule_id	loc	tags
`HEUR_LOAD_MW_GTE_300`	non-cited heuristic: large load (MW total ≥ 300) increases upgrade exposure pressure	`mw_threshold` `non_cited_heuristic` `upgrade_exposure`
`HEUR_MISSING_INPUTS_PRESENT_INCREASES_WAIT_PRESSURE`	non-cited heuristic: missing inputs increase process waiting/latency pressure	`data_completeness` `non_cited_heuristic` `process_latency`
`HEUR_PHASED_PLAN_REDUCES_UPGRADE_PRESSURE`	non-cited heuristic: phased energization plan can reduce upgrade exposure pressure in screening	`non_cited_heuristic` `phased_plan` `upgrade_exposure`

ONCOR_STD_520_106 (11)

rule_id	loc	tags
`ONCOR_520_106_SYSTEM_PROTECTION_REQUIREMENTS`	p.8, Sec 6.0 "System Protection Requirements" (protection requirements depend on POD/location/line protection)	`protection` `upgrade_exposure`
`ONC_001_TRANSMISSION_VOLTAGE_SCOPE`	Section 1.1, p.1	`transmission_scope`
`ONC_002_VOLTAGE_AVAILABILITY`	Section 3.4.1, p.3	`voltage_selection_risk`
`ONC_003_LOAD_PROJECTION`	Section 4.1.8, p.6	`data_completeness` `process_latency` `timeline_dependency`
`ONC_004_ONE_LINE_DIAGRAM`	Section 4.1.6, p.6	`data_completeness` `engineering_review` `process_latency`
`ONC_005_FAULT_INTERRUPT_RATING`	Section 5.2.1, p.7	`protection` `short_circuit` `upgrade_exposure`
`ONC_006_DUAL_FAULT_SENSING_CLOSE`	Section 6.1.1, p.8	`protection` `upgrade_exposure`
`ONC_007_6_CYCLE_CLEARING`	Section 6.1.1, p.8	`protection` `upgrade_exposure`
`ONC_008_3_CYCLE_BREAKER`	Section 6.1.2, p.11	`protection` `upgrade_exposure`
`ONC_009_REVENUE_METERING`	Section 3.6.1, p.3–4	`metering_requirement`
`ONC_011_LOAD_REMOVAL_RIGHT`	Section 7.1.3, p.22	`curtailment_risk` `operational_constraint`

PUCT_PROJECT_58481_LARGE_LOAD (3)

rule_id	loc	tags
`PUCT_001_PROJECT_58481_RULEMAKING_DEPENDENCY`	p.1, PUCT Project No. 58481, docket filing (Sierra Club comments on 2nd Discussion Draft, 16 TAC §25.194, Jan 9 2026 workshop); rulemaking ongoing	`compliance_dependency` `governance_dependency` `puct_rule_pending` `timeline_dependency`
`PUCT_002_REGULATORY_CHANGE_MAY_ALTER_LLIS_OBLIGATIONS`	p.1-3, PUCT Project No. 58481, docket (16 TAC §25.194) — rulemaking establishing new interconnection standards for large loads; corroborated by ERCOT Q&A Rev.12.15.25 ("PUC is in the process of establishing new interconnection standards for large loads in Project No. 58481")	`compliance_dependency` `process_latency` `puct_rule_pending` `timeline_risk`
`PUCT_003_RULEMAKING_MAY_AFFECT_ENERGIZATION_REQUIREMENTS`	p.1, PUCT Project No. 58481, docket (Sierra Club comments reference 50% backup generation threshold, SB 6 compliance, and large load qualification standards under 16 TAC §25.194)	`compliance_dependency` `energization_gate` `process_latency` `puct_rule_pending`

batch_study (8)

doc_id	rule_id	loc
`ERCOT_LLI_BATCH_STUDY_PPT_20260122`	`RESTUDY_001_MATERIAL_CHANGE_UNDER_BATCH_CYCLE`	Slide 5-7, ERCOT-Large-Load-Batch-Studies-LLWG_01222026.pptx (Slide 5: Transitional Batch Zero and restudy context; Slide 7: TSP role changes impacting in-progress LLI requests during batch transition)
`ERCOT_LLI_BATCH_STUDY_WORKSHOP_20260203`	`BATCH_001_BATCH_STUDY_PROCESS_PENDING_POLICY`	ERCOT-Large-Load-Batch-Study-Workshop-02032026.pptx, Slide 5 (background) and Slide 8 (batch process overview); PUCT Open Meeting presentation planned for 2026-02-20.
`ERCOT_LLI_BATCH_STUDY_WORKSHOP_20260203`	`BATCH_004_WORKSHOP_PROCESS_ONGOING`	ERCOT-Large-Load-Batch-Study-Workshop-02032026.pptx, Slide 2 (disclaimer), Slide 47-48 (next steps); PUCT Open Meeting 2026-02-20.
`ERCOT_MARKET_NOTICE_A122325_01`	`POLICY_001_TEXAS_TRIBUNE_DATA_CENTER_ERCOT_NEW_FRAMEWORK`	p.1, M-A122325-01 (context: public reporting of ERCOT shift to data-center batch study framework)
`ERCOT_MARKET_NOTICE_A122325_01`	`QA_REV1215_BATCH_STUDY_REFERENCE_PROCESS`	p.1, M-A122325-01 (batch study process announcement, Dec 23 2025; PGRR115 already insufficient; batch study as successor framework)
`ERCOT_MARKET_NOTICE_A122325_01`	`RESTUDY_002_QUEUE_DISRUPTION_NEARBY_MUST_STUDY`	p.1, M-A122325-01 – LONG DESCRIPTION: structural challenges including "coordination across TSPs, repeated restudies, and a growing backlog." Also corroborated by Q&A Rev.12.15.25 p.10: "A common reason re-studies are needed is that another large load customer in the same area becomes a must-study load."
`ERCOT_MARKET_NOTICE_A122325_03`	`MARKET_NOTICE_001_ERCOT_NOTICES_AS_POLICY_SIGNAL`	p.1, M-A122325-03 (Jan 30, 2026): draft framework posted for Feb 3 workshop; feedback deadline Feb 5; sets up Feb 12 second workshop; framework to be filed at Feb 20 PUC Open Meeting.
`ERCOT_MARKET_NOTICE_A122325_05`	`MARKET_NOTICE_002_ERCOT_NOTICES_A122325_05_LATEST`	p.1, M-A122325-05 (Feb 17, 2026): "PUC recently provided guidance to ERCOT and stakeholders to engage in an expedited process to develop revision requests that create a new Batch Zero study for consideration at the June 1, 2026 ERCOT Board meeting."

cancellation_risk (2)

doc_id	rule_id	loc
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_029B_CANCELLATION_RISK_IF_SECTION_9_5_NOT_SATISFIED_180_DAYS_FINANCIAL_SECURITY`	p.138, Section 9.4(9) ("If the requirements of Section 9.5, have not been satisfied within 180 days after the communication of the completion of the LLIS")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_029_CANCELLATION_RISK_IF_SECTION_9_5_NOT_SATISFIED_180_DAYS_AGREEMENTS`	p.138, Section 9.4(9) ("If the requirements of Section 9.5, have not been satisfied within 180 days after the communication of the completion of the LLIS")

commissioning_limit (2)

doc_id	rule_id	loc
`ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA`	`LL_QA_015_CONSUMPTION_LIMIT`	p.16, Planning Guide Sections 9.2.2 & 9.6
`ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST`	`LLI_EN_009_CONSUMPTION_LIMIT`	p.2, "Maintain Load consumption at or below"

commissioning_plan (7)

doc_id	rule_id	loc
`ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA`	`LL_QA_004_LOAD_COMMISSIONING_PLAN`	p.7, Planning Guide Section 9.2.2
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_005_LLIS_PREINIT_PRELIM_LCP_REQUIRED`	p.129, Section 9.2.2(1)(b) ("Submission of a preliminary Load Commissioning Plan (LCP)")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_013_LCP_SECTION_9_2_4`	p.131, Section 9.2.4 ("9.2.4 Load Commissioning Plan")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_014_LCP_UPDATE_AFTER_LLIS_COMPLETION`	p.131, Section 9.2.4(2) ("Upon the completion of the LLIS")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_015_LCP_UPDATE_AFTER_AGREEMENTS_EXECUTED`	p.131, Section 9.2.4(3) ("Upon the execution of any required agreements")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_022_ENERGIZATION_CURRENT_LCP_REQUIRED`	p.141, Section 9.6(e) ("Submission of a current Load Commissioning Plan (LCP)")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_028_LCP_PHASES_REQUIRED_IF_PHASED_PLAN`	p.131, Section 9.2.4(1) ("The LCP must specify the load increments and timeline by which the ILLE intends to increase peak Demand")

compliance_dependency (3)

doc_id	rule_id	loc
`PUCT_PROJECT_58481_LARGE_LOAD`	`PUCT_001_PROJECT_58481_RULEMAKING_DEPENDENCY`	p.1, PUCT Project No. 58481, docket filing (Sierra Club comments on 2nd Discussion Draft, 16 TAC §25.194, Jan 9 2026 workshop); rulemaking ongoing
`PUCT_PROJECT_58481_LARGE_LOAD`	`PUCT_002_REGULATORY_CHANGE_MAY_ALTER_LLIS_OBLIGATIONS`	p.1-3, PUCT Project No. 58481, docket (16 TAC §25.194) — rulemaking establishing new interconnection standards for large loads; corroborated by ERCOT Q&A Rev.12.15.25 ("PUC is in the process of establishing new interconnection standards for large loads in Project No. 58481")
`PUCT_PROJECT_58481_LARGE_LOAD`	`PUCT_003_RULEMAKING_MAY_AFFECT_ENERGIZATION_REQUIREMENTS`	p.1, PUCT Project No. 58481, docket (Sierra Club comments reference 50% backup generation threshold, SB 6 compliance, and large load qualification standards under 16 TAC §25.194)

curtailment (1)

doc_id	rule_id	loc
`ERCOT_PGRR_PENDING_LARGE_LOAD_TRACKER`	`PGRR_134_DISPATCHABLE_LOAD_REFORM_PENDING`	PGRR134: Interconnection Studies Reform for Dispatchable Loads (pending at ROS as of 2026-02-28)

curtailment_risk (2)

doc_id	rule_id	loc
`ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA`	`LL_QA_013_RIDE_THROUGH`	p.14–15, "voltage and frequency ride-through risks"
`ONCOR_STD_520_106`	`ONC_011_LOAD_REMOVAL_RIGHT`	Section 7.1.3, p.22

data_completeness (17)

doc_id	rule_id	loc
`ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA`	`LL_QA_004_LOAD_COMMISSIONING_PLAN`	p.7, Planning Guide Section 9.2.2
`ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST`	`ERCOT_LLI_INTAKE_REQUIRED_DOCS`	p.1, Instructions ("All fields must be completed unless otherwise noted")
`ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST`	`LLI_EN_004_SSO_APPLICABILITY`	p.2, "Is a SSO study required for this Large Load interconnection?"
`ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST`	`LLI_EN_012_DME_APPLICABILITY`	p.2, "Disturbance Monitoring Equipment (DME) is required"
`ERCOT_LLI_INSTRUCTIONS_COMMUNICATION`	`LLI_COMMUNICATION_INSTRUCTIONS_SUBMISSION_CHANNELS`	Instructions for Communication of Large Load Information (effective Dec 15, 2025)
`ERCOT_LLI_LOAD_INFORMATION_FORM_V1`	`LLI_INTAKE_LOAD_INFORMATION_FORM_V1_REQUIRED`	Load Information Form V1 (effective Dec 15, 2025); linked from ERCOT LLI page
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_005_LLIS_PREINIT_PRELIM_LCP_REQUIRED`	p.129, Section 9.2.2(1)(b) ("Submission of a preliminary Load Commissioning Plan (LCP)")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_006_LLIS_PREINIT_WRITTEN_ACK_REQUIRED`	p.129, Section 9.2.2(1)(c) ("Written acknowledgement from the Interconnecting Large Load Entity (ILLE)")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_007_LLIS_PREINIT_FORMAL_REQUEST_REQUIRED`	p.129, Section 9.2.2(1)(d) ("A formal request to initiate the LLIS process")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_008_LLIS_PREINIT_APPLICATION_FEE_REQUIRED`	p.130, Section 9.2.2(1)(e) ("Payment of the LLIS Application Fee")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_014_LCP_UPDATE_AFTER_LLIS_COMPLETION`	p.131, Section 9.2.4(2) ("Upon the completion of the LLIS")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_022_ENERGIZATION_CURRENT_LCP_REQUIRED`	p.141, Section 9.6(e) ("Submission of a current Load Commissioning Plan (LCP)")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_025_LLIS_PREINIT_STUDY_DATA_PACKAGE_REQUIRED`	p.129, Section 9.2.2(1)(a) ("Submission of all information, including but not limited to, data required by the lead Transmission Service Provider (TSP) to perform steady state, short circuit, motor start, stability analyses")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_028_LCP_PHASES_REQUIRED_IF_PHASED_PLAN`	p.131, Section 9.2.4(1) ("The LCP must specify the load increments and timeline by which the ILLE intends to increase peak Demand")
`NON_CITED_HEURISTIC`	`HEUR_MISSING_INPUTS_PRESENT_INCREASES_WAIT_PRESSURE`	non-cited heuristic: missing inputs increase process waiting/latency pressure
`ONCOR_STD_520_106`	`ONC_003_LOAD_PROJECTION`	Section 4.1.8, p.6
`ONCOR_STD_520_106`	`ONC_004_ONE_LINE_DIAGRAM`	Section 4.1.6, p.6

dwg_survey (1)

doc_id	rule_id	loc
`ERCOT_PGRR_PENDING_LARGE_LOAD_TRACKER`	`PGRR_144_DYNAMIC_MODEL_LARGE_ELECTRONIC_LOADS_PENDING`	PGRR144: Dynamic Model Submission and Review Requirements for Large Loads including Large Electronic Loads (pending at ROS as of 2026-02-28)

dynamic_model (1)

doc_id	rule_id	loc
`ERCOT_PGRR_PENDING_LARGE_LOAD_TRACKER`	`PGRR_144_DYNAMIC_MODEL_LARGE_ELECTRONIC_LOADS_PENDING`	PGRR144: Dynamic Model Submission and Review Requirements for Large Loads including Large Electronic Loads (pending at ROS as of 2026-02-28)

dynamic_stability (8)

doc_id	rule_id	loc
`ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA`	`LL_QA_007_REQUIRED_STUDIES`	p.8–9, "What types of reliability studies are required?"
`ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA`	`LL_QA_013_RIDE_THROUGH`	p.14–15, "voltage and frequency ride-through risks"
`ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST`	`LLI_EN_004_SSO_COMPLETE`	p.2, "The SSO study is complete and all required mitigation is in place"
`ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST`	`LLI_EN_007_MODEL_CONSISTENCY`	p.2, "no changes have been made to the load composition"
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_012_DYNAMIC_MODEL_CHANGE_IMPACTS_LLIS`	p.130, Section 9.2.3 ("dynamic model information used in the LLIS stability study")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_018_DYNAMIC_TRANSIENT_STABILITY_ELEMENT`	p.136, Section 9.3.4.3 ("Dynamic and Transient Stability Analysis")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_021_ENERGIZATION_SSO_COMPLETE_IF_REQUIRED`	p.141, Section 9.6(d) ("Subsynchronous Oscillation (SSO)")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_027_NEW_STABILITY_STUDY_DETERMINATION_IF_SUBSTANTIAL_CHANGE`	p.130, Section 9.2.3(2) ("the lead TSP shall determine whether a new stability study is required and provide a written explanation")

dynamic_study (1)

doc_id	rule_id	loc
`ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA`	`LL_QA_008_SSO_REQUIRED`	p.8, "Subsynchronous Oscillation study (SSO study)"

energization_gate (10)

doc_id	rule_id	loc
`ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA`	`LL_QA_008_SSO_REQUIRED`	p.8, "Subsynchronous Oscillation study (SSO study)"
`ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST`	`LLI_EN_001_WRITTEN_APPROVAL_REQUIRED`	p.3, "may not proceed until written approval"
`ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST`	`LLI_EN_003_LLIS_COMPLETE`	p.2, "All studies required per the Large Load Interconnection Study process have been completed and approved"
`ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST`	`LLI_EN_004_SSO_APPLICABILITY`	p.2, "Is a SSO study required for this Large Load interconnection?"
`ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST`	`LLI_EN_004_SSO_COMPLETE`	p.2, "The SSO study is complete and all required mitigation is in place"
`ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST`	`LLI_EN_012_DME_APPLICABILITY`	p.2, "Disturbance Monitoring Equipment (DME) is required"
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_021_ENERGIZATION_SSO_COMPLETE_IF_REQUIRED`	p.141, Section 9.6(d) ("Subsynchronous Oscillation (SSO)")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_022_ENERGIZATION_CURRENT_LCP_REQUIRED`	p.141, Section 9.6(e) ("Submission of a current Load Commissioning Plan (LCP)")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_023_LLIS_COMPLETION_COMMUNICATED`	p.100, ("ERCOT has communicated the completion of the LLIS")
`PUCT_PROJECT_58481_LARGE_LOAD`	`PUCT_003_RULEMAKING_MAY_AFFECT_ENERGIZATION_REQUIREMENTS`	p.1, PUCT Project No. 58481, docket (Sierra Club comments reference 50% backup generation threshold, SB 6 compliance, and large load qualification standards under 16 TAC §25.194)

engineering_review (1)

doc_id	rule_id	loc
`ONCOR_STD_520_106`	`ONC_004_ONE_LINE_DIAGRAM`	Section 4.1.6, p.6

fee_requirement (2)

doc_id	rule_id	loc
`ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA`	`LL_QA_005_APPLICATION_FEE`	p.7, Planning Guide Section 9.2.2 fee requirement
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_008_LLIS_PREINIT_APPLICATION_FEE_REQUIRED`	p.130, Section 9.2.2(1)(e) ("Payment of the LLIS Application Fee")

financial_security (1)

doc_id	rule_id	loc
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_029B_CANCELLATION_RISK_IF_SECTION_9_5_NOT_SATISFIED_180_DAYS_FINANCIAL_SECURITY`	p.138, Section 9.4(9) ("If the requirements of Section 9.5, have not been satisfied within 180 days after the communication of the completion of the LLIS")

governance_dependency (11)

doc_id	rule_id	loc
`ERCOT_LLI_BATCH_STUDY_WORKSHOP_20260203`	`BATCH_001_BATCH_STUDY_PROCESS_PENDING_POLICY`	ERCOT-Large-Load-Batch-Study-Workshop-02032026.pptx, Slide 5 (background) and Slide 8 (batch process overview); PUCT Open Meeting presentation planned for 2026-02-20.
`ERCOT_LLI_BATCH_STUDY_WORKSHOP_20260203`	`BATCH_004_WORKSHOP_PROCESS_ONGOING`	ERCOT-Large-Load-Batch-Study-Workshop-02032026.pptx, Slide 2 (disclaimer), Slide 47-48 (next steps); PUCT Open Meeting 2026-02-20.
`ERCOT_MARKET_NOTICE_A122325_01`	`POLICY_001_TEXAS_TRIBUNE_DATA_CENTER_ERCOT_NEW_FRAMEWORK`	p.1, M-A122325-01 (context: public reporting of ERCOT shift to data-center batch study framework)
`ERCOT_MARKET_NOTICE_A122325_03`	`MARKET_NOTICE_001_ERCOT_NOTICES_AS_POLICY_SIGNAL`	p.1, M-A122325-03 (Jan 30, 2026): draft framework posted for Feb 3 workshop; feedback deadline Feb 5; sets up Feb 12 second workshop; framework to be filed at Feb 20 PUC Open Meeting.
`ERCOT_MARKET_NOTICE_A122325_05`	`MARKET_NOTICE_002_ERCOT_NOTICES_A122325_05_LATEST`	p.1, M-A122325-05 (Feb 17, 2026): "PUC recently provided guidance to ERCOT and stakeholders to engage in an expedited process to develop revision requests that create a new Batch Zero study for consideration at the June 1, 2026 ERCOT Board meeting."
`ERCOT_PGRR_PENDING_LARGE_LOAD_TRACKER`	`PGRR_134_DISPATCHABLE_LOAD_REFORM_PENDING`	PGRR134: Interconnection Studies Reform for Dispatchable Loads (pending at ROS as of 2026-02-28)
`ERCOT_PGRR_PENDING_LARGE_LOAD_TRACKER`	`PGRR_136_STUDY_SCOPE_DOCUMENTATION_PENDING`	PGRR136: Large Load Interconnection Study Scope Documentation (pending at ROS as of 2026-02-28)
`ERCOT_PGRR_PENDING_LARGE_LOAD_TRACKER`	`PGRR_138_STUDY_REVIEW_APPROVAL_PROCESS_PENDING`	PGRR138: Large Load Interconnection Study Review and Approval Process (pending at ROS as of 2026-02-28)
`ERCOT_PGRR_PENDING_LARGE_LOAD_TRACKER`	`PGRR_141_SUBSTANTIATED_LOAD_REFORM_PENDING`	PGRR141: Large Load Interconnection Study Reform for Substantiated Load (pending at ROS as of 2026-02-28)
`ERCOT_PGRR_PENDING_LARGE_LOAD_TRACKER`	`PGRR_144_DYNAMIC_MODEL_LARGE_ELECTRONIC_LOADS_PENDING`	PGRR144: Dynamic Model Submission and Review Requirements for Large Loads including Large Electronic Loads (pending at ROS as of 2026-02-28)
`PUCT_PROJECT_58481_LARGE_LOAD`	`PUCT_001_PROJECT_58481_RULEMAKING_DEPENDENCY`	p.1, PUCT Project No. 58481, docket filing (Sierra Club comments on 2nd Discussion Draft, 16 TAC §25.194, Jan 9 2026 workshop); rulemaking ongoing

intake_gate (2)

doc_id	rule_id	loc
`ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA`	`LL_QA_003_TSP_INITIATION`	p.6, "initiate the Large Load Interconnection Process?"
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_007_LLIS_PREINIT_FORMAL_REQUEST_REQUIRED`	p.129, Section 9.2.2(1)(d) ("A formal request to initiate the LLIS process")

intake_requirement (2)

doc_id	rule_id	loc
`ERCOT_LLI_INSTRUCTIONS_COMMUNICATION`	`LLI_COMMUNICATION_INSTRUCTIONS_SUBMISSION_CHANNELS`	Instructions for Communication of Large Load Information (effective Dec 15, 2025)
`ERCOT_LLI_LOAD_INFORMATION_FORM_V1`	`LLI_INTAKE_LOAD_INFORMATION_FORM_V1_REQUIRED`	Load Information Form V1 (effective Dec 15, 2025); linked from ERCOT LLI page

market_notice (2)

doc_id	rule_id	loc
`ERCOT_MARKET_NOTICE_A122325_03`	`MARKET_NOTICE_001_ERCOT_NOTICES_AS_POLICY_SIGNAL`	p.1, M-A122325-03 (Jan 30, 2026): draft framework posted for Feb 3 workshop; feedback deadline Feb 5; sets up Feb 12 second workshop; framework to be filed at Feb 20 PUC Open Meeting.
`ERCOT_MARKET_NOTICE_A122325_05`	`MARKET_NOTICE_002_ERCOT_NOTICES_A122325_05_LATEST`	p.1, M-A122325-05 (Feb 17, 2026): "PUC recently provided guidance to ERCOT and stakeholders to engage in an expedited process to develop revision requests that create a new Batch Zero study for consideration at the June 1, 2026 ERCOT Board meeting."

metering_requirement (1)

doc_id	rule_id	loc
`ONCOR_STD_520_106`	`ONC_009_REVENUE_METERING`	Section 3.6.1, p.3–4

modification_trigger (4)

doc_id	rule_id	loc
`ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA`	`LL_QA_002_SECTION9_APPLICABILITY`	p.4, Section 9.2.1 Applicability
`ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST`	`LLI_EN_010_PEAK_INCREASE_FORM`	p.3, "any request to increase the amount of peak Demand"
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_003_LLIS_APPLICABILITY_MOD_INCREASE_AGGREGATE_PEAK`	p.129, Section 9.2.1(b) ("increases the aggregate peak")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_004_LLIS_APPLICABILITY_POI_CHANGE_OR_ADD`	p.129, Section 9.2.1(c) ("changes or adds a Point of")

must_study (1)

doc_id	rule_id	loc
`CONTEXT_SNAPSHOT`	`CTX_must_study`	as_of=2026-02-13; source=pilot snapshot (manual)

mw_threshold (1)

doc_id	rule_id	loc
`NON_CITED_HEURISTIC`	`HEUR_LOAD_MW_GTE_300`	non-cited heuristic: large load (MW total ≥ 300) increases upgrade exposure pressure

non_cited_heuristic (3)

doc_id	rule_id	loc
`NON_CITED_HEURISTIC`	`HEUR_LOAD_MW_GTE_300`	non-cited heuristic: large load (MW total ≥ 300) increases upgrade exposure pressure
`NON_CITED_HEURISTIC`	`HEUR_MISSING_INPUTS_PRESENT_INCREASES_WAIT_PRESSURE`	non-cited heuristic: missing inputs increase process waiting/latency pressure
`NON_CITED_HEURISTIC`	`HEUR_PHASED_PLAN_REDUCES_UPGRADE_PRESSURE`	non-cited heuristic: phased energization plan can reduce upgrade exposure pressure in screening

operational_constraint (4)

doc_id	rule_id	loc
`ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA`	`LL_QA_013_RIDE_THROUGH`	p.14–15, "voltage and frequency ride-through risks"
`ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA`	`LL_QA_015_CONSUMPTION_LIMIT`	p.16, Planning Guide Sections 9.2.2 & 9.6
`ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST`	`LLI_EN_009_CONSUMPTION_LIMIT`	p.2, "Maintain Load consumption at or below"
`ONCOR_STD_520_106`	`ONC_011_LOAD_REMOVAL_RIGHT`	Section 7.1.3, p.22

phased_plan (1)

doc_id	rule_id	loc
`NON_CITED_HEURISTIC`	`HEUR_PHASED_PLAN_REDUCES_UPGRADE_PRESSURE`	non-cited heuristic: phased energization plan can reduce upgrade exposure pressure in screening

policy_update (4)

doc_id	rule_id	loc
`ERCOT_LLI_BATCH_STUDY_WORKSHOP_20260203`	`BATCH_004_WORKSHOP_PROCESS_ONGOING`	ERCOT-Large-Load-Batch-Study-Workshop-02032026.pptx, Slide 2 (disclaimer), Slide 47-48 (next steps); PUCT Open Meeting 2026-02-20.
`ERCOT_MARKET_NOTICE_A122325_01`	`QA_REV1215_BATCH_STUDY_REFERENCE_PROCESS`	p.1, M-A122325-01 (batch study process announcement, Dec 23 2025; PGRR115 already insufficient; batch study as successor framework)
`ERCOT_MARKET_NOTICE_A122325_03`	`MARKET_NOTICE_001_ERCOT_NOTICES_AS_POLICY_SIGNAL`	p.1, M-A122325-03 (Jan 30, 2026): draft framework posted for Feb 3 workshop; feedback deadline Feb 5; sets up Feb 12 second workshop; framework to be filed at Feb 20 PUC Open Meeting.
`ERCOT_MARKET_NOTICE_A122325_05`	`MARKET_NOTICE_002_ERCOT_NOTICES_A122325_05_LATEST`	p.1, M-A122325-05 (Feb 17, 2026): "PUC recently provided guidance to ERCOT and stakeholders to engage in an expedited process to develop revision requests that create a new Batch Zero study for consideration at the June 1, 2026 ERCOT Board meeting."

process_latency (30)

doc_id	rule_id	loc
`ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA`	`LL_QA_003_TSP_INITIATION`	p.6, "initiate the Large Load Interconnection Process?"
`ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA`	`LL_QA_005_APPLICATION_FEE`	p.7, Planning Guide Section 9.2.2 fee requirement
`ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST`	`ERCOT_LLI_INTAKE_REQUIRED_DOCS`	p.1, Instructions ("All fields must be completed unless otherwise noted")
`ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST`	`LLI_EN_001_WRITTEN_APPROVAL_REQUIRED`	p.3, "may not proceed until written approval"
`ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST`	`LLI_EN_012_DME_APPLICABILITY`	p.2, "Disturbance Monitoring Equipment (DME) is required"
`ERCOT_LLI_INSTRUCTIONS_COMMUNICATION`	`LLI_COMMUNICATION_INSTRUCTIONS_SUBMISSION_CHANNELS`	Instructions for Communication of Large Load Information (effective Dec 15, 2025)
`ERCOT_LLI_LOAD_INFORMATION_FORM_V1`	`LLI_INTAKE_LOAD_INFORMATION_FORM_V1_REQUIRED`	Load Information Form V1 (effective Dec 15, 2025); linked from ERCOT LLI page
`ERCOT_MARKET_NOTICE_A122325_01`	`QA_REV1215_BATCH_STUDY_REFERENCE_PROCESS`	p.1, M-A122325-01 (batch study process announcement, Dec 23 2025; PGRR115 already insufficient; batch study as successor framework)
`ERCOT_PGRR_PENDING_LARGE_LOAD_TRACKER`	`PGRR_134_DISPATCHABLE_LOAD_REFORM_PENDING`	PGRR134: Interconnection Studies Reform for Dispatchable Loads (pending at ROS as of 2026-02-28)
`ERCOT_PGRR_PENDING_LARGE_LOAD_TRACKER`	`PGRR_136_STUDY_SCOPE_DOCUMENTATION_PENDING`	PGRR136: Large Load Interconnection Study Scope Documentation (pending at ROS as of 2026-02-28)
`ERCOT_PGRR_PENDING_LARGE_LOAD_TRACKER`	`PGRR_138_STUDY_REVIEW_APPROVAL_PROCESS_PENDING`	PGRR138: Large Load Interconnection Study Review and Approval Process (pending at ROS as of 2026-02-28)
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_005_LLIS_PREINIT_PRELIM_LCP_REQUIRED`	p.129, Section 9.2.2(1)(b) ("Submission of a preliminary Load Commissioning Plan (LCP)")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_006_LLIS_PREINIT_WRITTEN_ACK_REQUIRED`	p.129, Section 9.2.2(1)(c) ("Written acknowledgement from the Interconnecting Large Load Entity (ILLE)")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_007_LLIS_PREINIT_FORMAL_REQUEST_REQUIRED`	p.129, Section 9.2.2(1)(d) ("A formal request to initiate the LLIS process")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_008_LLIS_PREINIT_APPLICATION_FEE_REQUIRED`	p.130, Section 9.2.2(1)(e) ("Payment of the LLIS Application Fee")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_011_PROJECT_INFO_UPDATE_10_BUSINESS_DAYS`	p.130, Section 9.2.3 ("within ten Business Days")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_014_LCP_UPDATE_AFTER_LLIS_COMPLETION`	p.131, Section 9.2.4(2) ("Upon the completion of the LLIS")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_022_ENERGIZATION_CURRENT_LCP_REQUIRED`	p.141, Section 9.6(e) ("Submission of a current Load Commissioning Plan (LCP)")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_023_LLIS_COMPLETION_COMMUNICATED`	p.100, ("ERCOT has communicated the completion of the LLIS")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_025_LLIS_PREINIT_STUDY_DATA_PACKAGE_REQUIRED`	p.129, Section 9.2.2(1)(a) ("Submission of all information, including but not limited to, data required by the lead Transmission Service Provider (TSP) to perform steady state, short circuit, motor start, stability analyses")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_026_MATERIAL_CHANGE_NOTIFY_LEAD_TSP`	p.130, Section 9.2.3(2) ("The ILLE shall notify the lead TSP if a change to the load composition, technology, or parameters occurs")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_028_LCP_PHASES_REQUIRED_IF_PHASED_PLAN`	p.131, Section 9.2.4(1) ("The LCP must specify the load increments and timeline by which the ILLE intends to increase peak Demand")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_029B_CANCELLATION_RISK_IF_SECTION_9_5_NOT_SATISFIED_180_DAYS_FINANCIAL_SECURITY`	p.138, Section 9.4(9) ("If the requirements of Section 9.5, have not been satisfied within 180 days after the communication of the completion of the LLIS")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_029_CANCELLATION_RISK_IF_SECTION_9_5_NOT_SATISFIED_180_DAYS_AGREEMENTS`	p.138, Section 9.4(9) ("If the requirements of Section 9.5, have not been satisfied within 180 days after the communication of the completion of the LLIS")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_033_REQUIRED_INTERCONNECTION_EQUIPMENT_BREAKERS_TRANSMISSION_NOT_COLOCATED`	p.131, Section 9.2.5(1) ("interconnected at transmission voltage"; "must have ... breakers capable of interrupting fault current"; "remote control" by TO)
`NON_CITED_HEURISTIC`	`HEUR_MISSING_INPUTS_PRESENT_INCREASES_WAIT_PRESSURE`	non-cited heuristic: missing inputs increase process waiting/latency pressure
`ONCOR_STD_520_106`	`ONC_003_LOAD_PROJECTION`	Section 4.1.8, p.6
`ONCOR_STD_520_106`	`ONC_004_ONE_LINE_DIAGRAM`	Section 4.1.6, p.6
`PUCT_PROJECT_58481_LARGE_LOAD`	`PUCT_002_REGULATORY_CHANGE_MAY_ALTER_LLIS_OBLIGATIONS`	p.1-3, PUCT Project No. 58481, docket (16 TAC §25.194) — rulemaking establishing new interconnection standards for large loads; corroborated by ERCOT Q&A Rev.12.15.25 ("PUC is in the process of establishing new interconnection standards for large loads in Project No. 58481")
`PUCT_PROJECT_58481_LARGE_LOAD`	`PUCT_003_RULEMAKING_MAY_AFFECT_ENERGIZATION_REQUIREMENTS`	p.1, PUCT Project No. 58481, docket (Sierra Club comments reference 50% backup generation threshold, SB 6 compliance, and large load qualification standards under 16 TAC §25.194)

process_trigger (6)

doc_id	rule_id	loc
`ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA`	`LL_QA_001_LARGE_LOAD_DEFINITION`	p.3, "How does ERCOT define a large load?"
`ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA`	`LL_QA_002_SECTION9_APPLICABILITY`	p.4, Section 9.2.1 Applicability
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_001_LLIS_APPLICABILITY_SUBJECT_TO_LLIS`	p.129, Section 9.2.1 ("following criteria shall be subject to the Large Load Interconnection Study (LLIS)")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_002_LLIS_APPLICABILITY_NEW_LARGE_LOAD`	p.129, Section 9.2.1(a) ("A new Large Load;")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_003_LLIS_APPLICABILITY_MOD_INCREASE_AGGREGATE_PEAK`	p.129, Section 9.2.1(b) ("increases the aggregate peak")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_004_LLIS_APPLICABILITY_POI_CHANGE_OR_ADD`	p.129, Section 9.2.1(c) ("changes or adds a Point of")

protection (7)

doc_id	rule_id	loc
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_017_SYSTEM_PROTECTION_SHORT_CIRCUIT_ELEMENT`	p.136, Section 9.3.4.2 ("System Protection (Short-Circuit) Analysis")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_033_REQUIRED_INTERCONNECTION_EQUIPMENT_BREAKERS_TRANSMISSION_NOT_COLOCATED`	p.131, Section 9.2.5(1) ("interconnected at transmission voltage"; "must have ... breakers capable of interrupting fault current"; "remote control" by TO)
`ONCOR_STD_520_106`	`ONCOR_520_106_SYSTEM_PROTECTION_REQUIREMENTS`	p.8, Sec 6.0 "System Protection Requirements" (protection requirements depend on POD/location/line protection)
`ONCOR_STD_520_106`	`ONC_005_FAULT_INTERRUPT_RATING`	Section 5.2.1, p.7
`ONCOR_STD_520_106`	`ONC_006_DUAL_FAULT_SENSING_CLOSE`	Section 6.1.1, p.8
`ONCOR_STD_520_106`	`ONC_007_6_CYCLE_CLEARING`	Section 6.1.1, p.8
`ONCOR_STD_520_106`	`ONC_008_3_CYCLE_BREAKER`	Section 6.1.2, p.11

puct_rule_pending (3)

doc_id	rule_id	loc
`PUCT_PROJECT_58481_LARGE_LOAD`	`PUCT_001_PROJECT_58481_RULEMAKING_DEPENDENCY`	p.1, PUCT Project No. 58481, docket filing (Sierra Club comments on 2nd Discussion Draft, 16 TAC §25.194, Jan 9 2026 workshop); rulemaking ongoing
`PUCT_PROJECT_58481_LARGE_LOAD`	`PUCT_002_REGULATORY_CHANGE_MAY_ALTER_LLIS_OBLIGATIONS`	p.1-3, PUCT Project No. 58481, docket (16 TAC §25.194) — rulemaking establishing new interconnection standards for large loads; corroborated by ERCOT Q&A Rev.12.15.25 ("PUC is in the process of establishing new interconnection standards for large loads in Project No. 58481")
`PUCT_PROJECT_58481_LARGE_LOAD`	`PUCT_003_RULEMAKING_MAY_AFFECT_ENERGIZATION_REQUIREMENTS`	p.1, PUCT Project No. 58481, docket (Sierra Club comments reference 50% backup generation threshold, SB 6 compliance, and large load qualification standards under 16 TAC §25.194)

queue_density (4)

doc_id	rule_id	loc
`CONTEXT_SNAPSHOT`	`CTX_queue_density`	as_of=2026-02-13; source=pilot snapshot (manual); Example context input for v0 demo
`ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA`	`LL_QA_010_RESTUDY_QUEUE`	p.10, "studies of other nearby large"
`ERCOT_MARKET_NOTICE_A122325_01`	`POLICY_001_TEXAS_TRIBUNE_DATA_CENTER_ERCOT_NEW_FRAMEWORK`	p.1, M-A122325-01 (context: public reporting of ERCOT shift to data-center batch study framework)
`ERCOT_MARKET_NOTICE_A122325_01`	`RESTUDY_002_QUEUE_DISRUPTION_NEARBY_MUST_STUDY`	p.1, M-A122325-01 – LONG DESCRIPTION: structural challenges including "coordination across TSPs, repeated restudies, and a growing backlog." Also corroborated by Q&A Rev.12.15.25 p.10: "A common reason re-studies are needed is that another large load customer in the same area becomes a must-study load."

queue_dependency (2)

doc_id	rule_id	loc
`CONTEXT_SNAPSHOT`	`CTX_queue_dependency`	as_of=2026-02-13; source=pilot snapshot (manual)
`ERCOT_LLI_BATCH_STUDY_PPT_20260122`	`RESTUDY_001_MATERIAL_CHANGE_UNDER_BATCH_CYCLE`	Slide 5-7, ERCOT-Large-Load-Batch-Studies-LLWG_01222026.pptx (Slide 5: Transitional Batch Zero and restudy context; Slide 7: TSP role changes impacting in-progress LLI requests during batch transition)

queue_position (1)

doc_id	rule_id	loc
`ERCOT_PGRR_PENDING_LARGE_LOAD_TRACKER`	`PGRR_141_SUBSTANTIATED_LOAD_REFORM_PENDING`	PGRR141: Large Load Interconnection Study Reform for Substantiated Load (pending at ROS as of 2026-02-28)

re_study (13)

doc_id	rule_id	loc
`ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA`	`LL_QA_006_MATERIAL_CHANGE`	p.7, Planning Guide Section 9.2.3
`ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA`	`LL_QA_010_RESTUDY_QUEUE`	p.10, "studies of other nearby large"
`ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA`	`LL_QA_014_365_DAY_RULE`	p.15, Planning Guide Section 9.4(10)
`ERCOT_LLI_BATCH_STUDY_PPT_20260122`	`RESTUDY_001_MATERIAL_CHANGE_UNDER_BATCH_CYCLE`	Slide 5-7, ERCOT-Large-Load-Batch-Studies-LLWG_01222026.pptx (Slide 5: Transitional Batch Zero and restudy context; Slide 7: TSP role changes impacting in-progress LLI requests during batch transition)
`ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST`	`LLI_EN_007_MODEL_CONSISTENCY`	p.2, "no changes have been made to the load composition"
`ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST`	`LLI_EN_008_NOTIFY_CHANGES`	p.2, "obligation to notify the interconnecting TSP of changes"
`ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST`	`LLI_EN_010_PEAK_INCREASE_FORM`	p.3, "any request to increase the amount of peak Demand"
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_006_LLIS_PREINIT_WRITTEN_ACK_REQUIRED`	p.129, Section 9.2.2(1)(c) ("Written acknowledgement from the Interconnecting Large Load Entity (ILLE)")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_011_PROJECT_INFO_UPDATE_10_BUSINESS_DAYS`	p.130, Section 9.2.3 ("within ten Business Days")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_012_DYNAMIC_MODEL_CHANGE_IMPACTS_LLIS`	p.130, Section 9.2.3 ("dynamic model information used in the LLIS stability study")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_026_MATERIAL_CHANGE_NOTIFY_LEAD_TSP`	p.130, Section 9.2.3(2) ("The ILLE shall notify the lead TSP if a change to the load composition, technology, or parameters occurs")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_027_NEW_STABILITY_STUDY_DETERMINATION_IF_SUBSTANTIAL_CHANGE`	p.130, Section 9.2.3(2) ("the lead TSP shall determine whether a new stability study is required and provide a written explanation")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_030_365_DAY_INITIAL_ENERGIZATION_RESTUDY_OPINION`	p.138, Section 9.4(10) ("within 365 days after the Initial Energization date identified in the LLIS study report, the lead TSP shall provide an opinion to ERCOT on whether any of the completed LLIS elements require restudy")

regulatory_change (5)

doc_id	rule_id	loc
`ERCOT_PGRR_PENDING_LARGE_LOAD_TRACKER`	`PGRR_134_DISPATCHABLE_LOAD_REFORM_PENDING`	PGRR134: Interconnection Studies Reform for Dispatchable Loads (pending at ROS as of 2026-02-28)
`ERCOT_PGRR_PENDING_LARGE_LOAD_TRACKER`	`PGRR_136_STUDY_SCOPE_DOCUMENTATION_PENDING`	PGRR136: Large Load Interconnection Study Scope Documentation (pending at ROS as of 2026-02-28)
`ERCOT_PGRR_PENDING_LARGE_LOAD_TRACKER`	`PGRR_138_STUDY_REVIEW_APPROVAL_PROCESS_PENDING`	PGRR138: Large Load Interconnection Study Review and Approval Process (pending at ROS as of 2026-02-28)
`ERCOT_PGRR_PENDING_LARGE_LOAD_TRACKER`	`PGRR_141_SUBSTANTIATED_LOAD_REFORM_PENDING`	PGRR141: Large Load Interconnection Study Reform for Substantiated Load (pending at ROS as of 2026-02-28)
`ERCOT_PGRR_PENDING_LARGE_LOAD_TRACKER`	`PGRR_144_DYNAMIC_MODEL_LARGE_ELECTRONIC_LOADS_PENDING`	PGRR144: Dynamic Model Submission and Review Requirements for Large Loads including Large Electronic Loads (pending at ROS as of 2026-02-28)

restudy_risk (2)

doc_id	rule_id	loc
`ERCOT_LLI_BATCH_STUDY_PPT_20260122`	`RESTUDY_001_MATERIAL_CHANGE_UNDER_BATCH_CYCLE`	Slide 5-7, ERCOT-Large-Load-Batch-Studies-LLWG_01222026.pptx (Slide 5: Transitional Batch Zero and restudy context; Slide 7: TSP role changes impacting in-progress LLI requests during batch transition)
`ERCOT_MARKET_NOTICE_A122325_01`	`RESTUDY_002_QUEUE_DISRUPTION_NEARBY_MUST_STUDY`	p.1, M-A122325-01 – LONG DESCRIPTION: structural challenges including "coordination across TSPs, repeated restudies, and a growing backlog." Also corroborated by Q&A Rev.12.15.25 p.10: "A common reason re-studies are needed is that another large load customer in the same area becomes a must-study load."

short_circuit (3)

doc_id	rule_id	loc
`ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA`	`LL_QA_007_REQUIRED_STUDIES`	p.8–9, "What types of reliability studies are required?"
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_017_SYSTEM_PROTECTION_SHORT_CIRCUIT_ELEMENT`	p.136, Section 9.3.4.2 ("System Protection (Short-Circuit) Analysis")
`ONCOR_STD_520_106`	`ONC_005_FAULT_INTERRUPT_RATING`	Section 5.2.1, p.7

sso (3)

doc_id	rule_id	loc
`ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA`	`LL_QA_008_SSO_REQUIRED`	p.8, "Subsynchronous Oscillation study (SSO study)"
`ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST`	`LLI_EN_004_SSO_COMPLETE`	p.2, "The SSO study is complete and all required mitigation is in place"
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_021_ENERGIZATION_SSO_COMPLETE_IF_REQUIRED`	p.141, Section 9.6(d) ("Subsynchronous Oscillation (SSO)")

steady_state (2)

doc_id	rule_id	loc
`ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA`	`LL_QA_007_REQUIRED_STUDIES`	p.8–9, "What types of reliability studies are required?"
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_016_STEADY_STATE_ANALYSIS_ELEMENT`	p.135, Section 9.3.4.1 ("9.3.4.1 Steady-State Analysis")

study_dependency (15)

doc_id	rule_id	loc
`ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA`	`LL_QA_007_REQUIRED_STUDIES`	p.8–9, "What types of reliability studies are required?"
`ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA`	`LL_QA_008_SSO_REQUIRED`	p.8, "Subsynchronous Oscillation study (SSO study)"
`ERCOT_LLI_BATCH_STUDY_WORKSHOP_20260203`	`BATCH_001_BATCH_STUDY_PROCESS_PENDING_POLICY`	ERCOT-Large-Load-Batch-Study-Workshop-02032026.pptx, Slide 5 (background) and Slide 8 (batch process overview); PUCT Open Meeting presentation planned for 2026-02-20.
`ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST`	`LLI_EN_003_LLIS_COMPLETE`	p.2, "All studies required per the Large Load Interconnection Study process have been completed and approved"
`ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST`	`LLI_EN_004_SSO_APPLICABILITY`	p.2, "Is a SSO study required for this Large Load interconnection?"
`ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST`	`LLI_EN_004_SSO_COMPLETE`	p.2, "The SSO study is complete and all required mitigation is in place"
`ERCOT_MARKET_NOTICE_A122325_01`	`RESTUDY_002_QUEUE_DISRUPTION_NEARBY_MUST_STUDY`	p.1, M-A122325-01 – LONG DESCRIPTION: structural challenges including "coordination across TSPs, repeated restudies, and a growing backlog." Also corroborated by Q&A Rev.12.15.25 p.10: "A common reason re-studies are needed is that another large load customer in the same area becomes a must-study load."
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_012_DYNAMIC_MODEL_CHANGE_IMPACTS_LLIS`	p.130, Section 9.2.3 ("dynamic model information used in the LLIS stability study")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_016_STEADY_STATE_ANALYSIS_ELEMENT`	p.135, Section 9.3.4.1 ("9.3.4.1 Steady-State Analysis")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_017_SYSTEM_PROTECTION_SHORT_CIRCUIT_ELEMENT`	p.136, Section 9.3.4.2 ("System Protection (Short-Circuit) Analysis")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_018_DYNAMIC_TRANSIENT_STABILITY_ELEMENT`	p.136, Section 9.3.4.3 ("Dynamic and Transient Stability Analysis")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_021_ENERGIZATION_SSO_COMPLETE_IF_REQUIRED`	p.141, Section 9.6(d) ("Subsynchronous Oscillation (SSO)")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_023_LLIS_COMPLETION_COMMUNICATED`	p.100, ("ERCOT has communicated the completion of the LLIS")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_025_LLIS_PREINIT_STUDY_DATA_PACKAGE_REQUIRED`	p.129, Section 9.2.2(1)(a) ("Submission of all information, including but not limited to, data required by the lead Transmission Service Provider (TSP) to perform steady state, short circuit, motor start, stability analyses")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_027_NEW_STABILITY_STUDY_DETERMINATION_IF_SUBSTANTIAL_CHANGE`	p.130, Section 9.2.3(2) ("the lead TSP shall determine whether a new stability study is required and provide a written explanation")

study_scope (4)

doc_id	rule_id	loc
`ERCOT_PGRR_PENDING_LARGE_LOAD_TRACKER`	`PGRR_134_DISPATCHABLE_LOAD_REFORM_PENDING`	PGRR134: Interconnection Studies Reform for Dispatchable Loads (pending at ROS as of 2026-02-28)
`ERCOT_PGRR_PENDING_LARGE_LOAD_TRACKER`	`PGRR_136_STUDY_SCOPE_DOCUMENTATION_PENDING`	PGRR136: Large Load Interconnection Study Scope Documentation (pending at ROS as of 2026-02-28)
`ERCOT_PGRR_PENDING_LARGE_LOAD_TRACKER`	`PGRR_138_STUDY_REVIEW_APPROVAL_PROCESS_PENDING`	PGRR138: Large Load Interconnection Study Review and Approval Process (pending at ROS as of 2026-02-28)
`ERCOT_PGRR_PENDING_LARGE_LOAD_TRACKER`	`PGRR_141_SUBSTANTIATED_LOAD_REFORM_PENDING`	PGRR141: Large Load Interconnection Study Reform for Substantiated Load (pending at ROS as of 2026-02-28)

timeline_dependency (7)

doc_id	rule_id	loc
`ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA`	`LL_QA_004_LOAD_COMMISSIONING_PLAN`	p.7, Planning Guide Section 9.2.2
`ERCOT_LLI_BATCH_STUDY_WORKSHOP_20260203`	`BATCH_004_WORKSHOP_PROCESS_ONGOING`	ERCOT-Large-Load-Batch-Study-Workshop-02032026.pptx, Slide 2 (disclaimer), Slide 47-48 (next steps); PUCT Open Meeting 2026-02-20.
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_013_LCP_SECTION_9_2_4`	p.131, Section 9.2.4 ("9.2.4 Load Commissioning Plan")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_015_LCP_UPDATE_AFTER_AGREEMENTS_EXECUTED`	p.131, Section 9.2.4(3) ("Upon the execution of any required agreements")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_028_LCP_PHASES_REQUIRED_IF_PHASED_PLAN`	p.131, Section 9.2.4(1) ("The LCP must specify the load increments and timeline by which the ILLE intends to increase peak Demand")
`ONCOR_STD_520_106`	`ONC_003_LOAD_PROJECTION`	Section 4.1.8, p.6
`PUCT_PROJECT_58481_LARGE_LOAD`	`PUCT_001_PROJECT_58481_RULEMAKING_DEPENDENCY`	p.1, PUCT Project No. 58481, docket filing (Sierra Club comments on 2nd Discussion Draft, 16 TAC §25.194, Jan 9 2026 workshop); rulemaking ongoing

timeline_risk (23)

doc_id	rule_id	loc
`ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA`	`LL_QA_006_MATERIAL_CHANGE`	p.7, Planning Guide Section 9.2.3
`ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA`	`LL_QA_010_RESTUDY_QUEUE`	p.10, "studies of other nearby large"
`ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA`	`LL_QA_014_365_DAY_RULE`	p.15, Planning Guide Section 9.4(10)
`ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA`	`LL_QA_015_CONSUMPTION_LIMIT`	p.16, Planning Guide Sections 9.2.2 & 9.6
`ERCOT_LLI_BATCH_STUDY_PPT_20260122`	`RESTUDY_001_MATERIAL_CHANGE_UNDER_BATCH_CYCLE`	Slide 5-7, ERCOT-Large-Load-Batch-Studies-LLWG_01222026.pptx (Slide 5: Transitional Batch Zero and restudy context; Slide 7: TSP role changes impacting in-progress LLI requests during batch transition)
`ERCOT_LLI_BATCH_STUDY_WORKSHOP_20260203`	`BATCH_001_BATCH_STUDY_PROCESS_PENDING_POLICY`	ERCOT-Large-Load-Batch-Study-Workshop-02032026.pptx, Slide 5 (background) and Slide 8 (batch process overview); PUCT Open Meeting presentation planned for 2026-02-20.
`ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST`	`LLI_EN_007_MODEL_CONSISTENCY`	p.2, "no changes have been made to the load composition"
`ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST`	`LLI_EN_008_NOTIFY_CHANGES`	p.2, "obligation to notify the interconnecting TSP of changes"
`ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST`	`LLI_EN_010_PEAK_INCREASE_FORM`	p.3, "any request to increase the amount of peak Demand"
`ERCOT_MARKET_NOTICE_A122325_01`	`POLICY_001_TEXAS_TRIBUNE_DATA_CENTER_ERCOT_NEW_FRAMEWORK`	p.1, M-A122325-01 (context: public reporting of ERCOT shift to data-center batch study framework)
`ERCOT_MARKET_NOTICE_A122325_01`	`RESTUDY_002_QUEUE_DISRUPTION_NEARBY_MUST_STUDY`	p.1, M-A122325-01 – LONG DESCRIPTION: structural challenges including "coordination across TSPs, repeated restudies, and a growing backlog." Also corroborated by Q&A Rev.12.15.25 p.10: "A common reason re-studies are needed is that another large load customer in the same area becomes a must-study load."
`ERCOT_MARKET_NOTICE_A122325_05`	`MARKET_NOTICE_002_ERCOT_NOTICES_A122325_05_LATEST`	p.1, M-A122325-05 (Feb 17, 2026): "PUC recently provided guidance to ERCOT and stakeholders to engage in an expedited process to develop revision requests that create a new Batch Zero study for consideration at the June 1, 2026 ERCOT Board meeting."
`ERCOT_PGRR_PENDING_LARGE_LOAD_TRACKER`	`PGRR_138_STUDY_REVIEW_APPROVAL_PROCESS_PENDING`	PGRR138: Large Load Interconnection Study Review and Approval Process (pending at ROS as of 2026-02-28)
`ERCOT_PGRR_PENDING_LARGE_LOAD_TRACKER`	`PGRR_141_SUBSTANTIATED_LOAD_REFORM_PENDING`	PGRR141: Large Load Interconnection Study Reform for Substantiated Load (pending at ROS as of 2026-02-28)
`ERCOT_PGRR_PENDING_LARGE_LOAD_TRACKER`	`PGRR_144_DYNAMIC_MODEL_LARGE_ELECTRONIC_LOADS_PENDING`	PGRR144: Dynamic Model Submission and Review Requirements for Large Loads including Large Electronic Loads (pending at ROS as of 2026-02-28)
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_011_PROJECT_INFO_UPDATE_10_BUSINESS_DAYS`	p.130, Section 9.2.3 ("within ten Business Days")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_012_DYNAMIC_MODEL_CHANGE_IMPACTS_LLIS`	p.130, Section 9.2.3 ("dynamic model information used in the LLIS stability study")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_026_MATERIAL_CHANGE_NOTIFY_LEAD_TSP`	p.130, Section 9.2.3(2) ("The ILLE shall notify the lead TSP if a change to the load composition, technology, or parameters occurs")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_027_NEW_STABILITY_STUDY_DETERMINATION_IF_SUBSTANTIAL_CHANGE`	p.130, Section 9.2.3(2) ("the lead TSP shall determine whether a new stability study is required and provide a written explanation")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_029B_CANCELLATION_RISK_IF_SECTION_9_5_NOT_SATISFIED_180_DAYS_FINANCIAL_SECURITY`	p.138, Section 9.4(9) ("If the requirements of Section 9.5, have not been satisfied within 180 days after the communication of the completion of the LLIS")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_029_CANCELLATION_RISK_IF_SECTION_9_5_NOT_SATISFIED_180_DAYS_AGREEMENTS`	p.138, Section 9.4(9) ("If the requirements of Section 9.5, have not been satisfied within 180 days after the communication of the completion of the LLIS")
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_030_365_DAY_INITIAL_ENERGIZATION_RESTUDY_OPINION`	p.138, Section 9.4(10) ("within 365 days after the Initial Energization date identified in the LLIS study report, the lead TSP shall provide an opinion to ERCOT on whether any of the completed LLIS elements require restudy")
`PUCT_PROJECT_58481_LARGE_LOAD`	`PUCT_002_REGULATORY_CHANGE_MAY_ALTER_LLIS_OBLIGATIONS`	p.1-3, PUCT Project No. 58481, docket (16 TAC §25.194) — rulemaking establishing new interconnection standards for large loads; corroborated by ERCOT Q&A Rev.12.15.25 ("PUC is in the process of establishing new interconnection standards for large loads in Project No. 58481")

transmission_scope (1)

doc_id	rule_id	loc
`ONCOR_STD_520_106`	`ONC_001_TRANSMISSION_VOLTAGE_SCOPE`	Section 1.1, p.1

upgrade_exposure (8)

doc_id	rule_id	loc
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	`PG9_033_REQUIRED_INTERCONNECTION_EQUIPMENT_BREAKERS_TRANSMISSION_NOT_COLOCATED`	p.131, Section 9.2.5(1) ("interconnected at transmission voltage"; "must have ... breakers capable of interrupting fault current"; "remote control" by TO)
`NON_CITED_HEURISTIC`	`HEUR_LOAD_MW_GTE_300`	non-cited heuristic: large load (MW total ≥ 300) increases upgrade exposure pressure
`NON_CITED_HEURISTIC`	`HEUR_PHASED_PLAN_REDUCES_UPGRADE_PRESSURE`	non-cited heuristic: phased energization plan can reduce upgrade exposure pressure in screening
`ONCOR_STD_520_106`	`ONCOR_520_106_SYSTEM_PROTECTION_REQUIREMENTS`	p.8, Sec 6.0 "System Protection Requirements" (protection requirements depend on POD/location/line protection)
`ONCOR_STD_520_106`	`ONC_005_FAULT_INTERRUPT_RATING`	Section 5.2.1, p.7
`ONCOR_STD_520_106`	`ONC_006_DUAL_FAULT_SENSING_CLOSE`	Section 6.1.1, p.8
`ONCOR_STD_520_106`	`ONC_007_6_CYCLE_CLEARING`	Section 6.1.1, p.8
`ONCOR_STD_520_106`	`ONC_008_3_CYCLE_BREAKER`	Section 6.1.2, p.11

voltage_selection_risk (1)

doc_id	rule_id	loc
`ONCOR_STD_520_106`	`ONC_002_VOLTAGE_AVAILABILITY`	Section 3.4.1, p.3

Risk trace (raw JSON)

[
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "ERCOT_LLI_INTAKE_REQUIRED_DOCS",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST",
    "loc": "p.1, Instructions (\"All fields must be completed unless otherwise noted\")",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "data_completeness",
      "process_latency"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:data_completeness => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:process_latency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "PG9_001_LLIS_APPLICABILITY_SUBJECT_TO_LLIS",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE",
    "loc": "p.129, Section 9.2.1 (\"following criteria shall be subject to the Large Load Interconnection Study (LLIS)\")",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "process_trigger"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": []
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "LL_QA_003_TSP_INITIATION",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA",
    "loc": "p.6, \"initiate the Large Load Interconnection Process?\"",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "intake_gate",
      "process_latency"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:intake_gate => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:process_latency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "LL_QA_004_LOAD_COMMISSIONING_PLAN",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA",
    "loc": "p.7, Planning Guide Section 9.2.2",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "commissioning_plan",
      "data_completeness",
      "timeline_dependency"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:commissioning_plan => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:data_completeness => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:timeline_dependency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "LL_QA_005_APPLICATION_FEE",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA",
    "loc": "p.7, Planning Guide Section 9.2.2 fee requirement",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "fee_requirement",
      "process_latency"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:fee_requirement => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:process_latency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "PG9_005_LLIS_PREINIT_PRELIM_LCP_REQUIRED",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE",
    "loc": "p.129, Section 9.2.2(1)(b) (\"Submission of a preliminary Load Commissioning Plan (LCP)\")",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "commissioning_plan",
      "data_completeness",
      "process_latency"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:commissioning_plan => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:data_completeness => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:process_latency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "PG9_006_LLIS_PREINIT_WRITTEN_ACK_REQUIRED",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE",
    "loc": "p.129, Section 9.2.2(1)(c) (\"Written acknowledgement from the Interconnecting Large Load Entity (ILLE)\")",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "data_completeness",
      "process_latency",
      "re_study"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 1.5,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:data_completeness => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:process_latency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:re_study => wait +1.5",
      "data_completeness missing=['ack_change_notification_obligation'] => baseline wait +2.0"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "PG9_007_LLIS_PREINIT_FORMAL_REQUEST_REQUIRED",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE",
    "loc": "p.129, Section 9.2.2(1)(d) (\"A formal request to initiate the LLIS process\")",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "data_completeness",
      "intake_gate",
      "process_latency"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:data_completeness => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:intake_gate => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:process_latency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "data_completeness missing=['llis_formal_request_submitted'] => baseline wait +2.0"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "PG9_008_LLIS_PREINIT_APPLICATION_FEE_REQUIRED",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE",
    "loc": "p.130, Section 9.2.2(1)(e) (\"Payment of the LLIS Application Fee\")",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "data_completeness",
      "fee_requirement",
      "process_latency"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:data_completeness => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:fee_requirement => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:process_latency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "PG9_025_LLIS_PREINIT_STUDY_DATA_PACKAGE_REQUIRED",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE",
    "loc": "p.129, Section 9.2.2(1)(a) (\"Submission of all information, including but not limited to, data required by the lead Transmission Service Provider (TSP) to perform steady state, short circuit, motor start, stability analyses\")",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "data_completeness",
      "process_latency",
      "study_dependency"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:data_completeness => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:process_latency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:study_dependency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "data_completeness missing=['llis_data_package_submitted'] => baseline wait +2.0"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "PG9_002_LLIS_APPLICABILITY_NEW_LARGE_LOAD",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE",
    "loc": "p.129, Section 9.2.1(a) (\"A new Large Load;\")",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "process_trigger"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": []
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "PG9_003_LLIS_APPLICABILITY_MOD_INCREASE_AGGREGATE_PEAK",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE",
    "loc": "p.129, Section 9.2.1(b) (\"increases the aggregate peak\")",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "modification_trigger",
      "process_trigger"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": []
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "PG9_004_LLIS_APPLICABILITY_POI_CHANGE_OR_ADD",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE",
    "loc": "p.129, Section 9.2.1(c) (\"changes or adds a Point of\")",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "modification_trigger",
      "process_trigger"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": []
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "LL_QA_002_SECTION9_APPLICABILITY",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA",
    "loc": "p.4, Section 9.2.1 Applicability",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "modification_trigger",
      "process_trigger"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": []
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "PG9_013_LCP_SECTION_9_2_4",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE",
    "loc": "p.131, Section 9.2.4 (\"9.2.4 Load Commissioning Plan\")",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "commissioning_plan",
      "timeline_dependency"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:commissioning_plan => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:timeline_dependency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "PUCT_001_PROJECT_58481_RULEMAKING_DEPENDENCY",
    "doc_id": "PUCT_PROJECT_58481_LARGE_LOAD",
    "loc": "p.1, PUCT Project No. 58481, docket filing (Sierra Club comments on 2nd Discussion Draft, 16 TAC §25.194, Jan 9 2026 workshop); rulemaking ongoing",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "compliance_dependency",
      "governance_dependency",
      "puct_rule_pending",
      "timeline_dependency"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:compliance_dependency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:governance_dependency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:puct_rule_pending => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:timeline_dependency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "PUCT_002_REGULATORY_CHANGE_MAY_ALTER_LLIS_OBLIGATIONS",
    "doc_id": "PUCT_PROJECT_58481_LARGE_LOAD",
    "loc": "p.1-3, PUCT Project No. 58481, docket (16 TAC §25.194) — rulemaking establishing new interconnection standards for large loads; corroborated by ERCOT Q&A Rev.12.15.25 (\"PUC is in the process of establishing new interconnection standards for large loads in Project No. 58481\")",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "compliance_dependency",
      "process_latency",
      "puct_rule_pending",
      "timeline_risk"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 1.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:compliance_dependency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:process_latency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:puct_rule_pending => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:timeline_risk => wait +1"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "POLICY_001_TEXAS_TRIBUNE_DATA_CENTER_ERCOT_NEW_FRAMEWORK",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_MARKET_NOTICE_A122325_01",
    "loc": "p.1, M-A122325-01 (context: public reporting of ERCOT shift to data-center batch study framework)",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "batch_study",
      "governance_dependency",
      "queue_density",
      "timeline_risk"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 2.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:batch_study => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:governance_dependency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:queue_density => wait +1",
      "tag:timeline_risk => wait +1"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "LLI_INTAKE_LOAD_INFORMATION_FORM_V1_REQUIRED",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_LLI_LOAD_INFORMATION_FORM_V1",
    "loc": "Load Information Form V1 (effective Dec 15, 2025); linked from ERCOT LLI page",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "data_completeness",
      "intake_requirement",
      "process_latency"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:data_completeness => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:process_latency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "LLI_COMMUNICATION_INSTRUCTIONS_SUBMISSION_CHANNELS",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_LLI_INSTRUCTIONS_COMMUNICATION",
    "loc": "Instructions for Communication of Large Load Information (effective Dec 15, 2025)",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "data_completeness",
      "intake_requirement",
      "process_latency"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:data_completeness => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:process_latency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "PGRR_136_STUDY_SCOPE_DOCUMENTATION_PENDING",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_PGRR_PENDING_LARGE_LOAD_TRACKER",
    "loc": "PGRR136: Large Load Interconnection Study Scope Documentation (pending at ROS as of 2026-02-28)",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "governance_dependency",
      "process_latency",
      "regulatory_change",
      "study_scope"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:governance_dependency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:process_latency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "PGRR_138_STUDY_REVIEW_APPROVAL_PROCESS_PENDING",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_PGRR_PENDING_LARGE_LOAD_TRACKER",
    "loc": "PGRR138: Large Load Interconnection Study Review and Approval Process (pending at ROS as of 2026-02-28)",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "governance_dependency",
      "process_latency",
      "regulatory_change",
      "study_scope",
      "timeline_risk"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 1.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:governance_dependency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:process_latency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:timeline_risk => wait +1"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "PGRR_141_SUBSTANTIATED_LOAD_REFORM_PENDING",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_PGRR_PENDING_LARGE_LOAD_TRACKER",
    "loc": "PGRR141: Large Load Interconnection Study Reform for Substantiated Load (pending at ROS as of 2026-02-28)",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "governance_dependency",
      "queue_position",
      "regulatory_change",
      "study_scope",
      "timeline_risk"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 1.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:governance_dependency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:timeline_risk => wait +1"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "PGRR_134_DISPATCHABLE_LOAD_REFORM_PENDING",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_PGRR_PENDING_LARGE_LOAD_TRACKER",
    "loc": "PGRR134: Interconnection Studies Reform for Dispatchable Loads (pending at ROS as of 2026-02-28)",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "curtailment",
      "governance_dependency",
      "process_latency",
      "regulatory_change",
      "study_scope"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:governance_dependency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:process_latency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "PGRR_144_DYNAMIC_MODEL_LARGE_ELECTRONIC_LOADS_PENDING",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_PGRR_PENDING_LARGE_LOAD_TRACKER",
    "loc": "PGRR144: Dynamic Model Submission and Review Requirements for Large Loads including Large Electronic Loads (pending at ROS as of 2026-02-28)",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "dwg_survey",
      "dynamic_model",
      "governance_dependency",
      "regulatory_change",
      "timeline_risk"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 1.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:governance_dependency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:timeline_risk => wait +1"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "LL_QA_001_LARGE_LOAD_DEFINITION",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA",
    "loc": "p.3, \"How does ERCOT define a large load?\"",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "process_trigger"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": []
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "PG9_028_LCP_PHASES_REQUIRED_IF_PHASED_PLAN",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE",
    "loc": "p.131, Section 9.2.4(1) (\"The LCP must specify the load increments and timeline by which the ILLE intends to increase peak Demand\")",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "commissioning_plan",
      "data_completeness",
      "process_latency",
      "timeline_dependency"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:commissioning_plan => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:data_completeness => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:process_latency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:timeline_dependency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "ONC_003_LOAD_PROJECTION",
    "doc_id": "ONCOR_STD_520_106",
    "loc": "Section 4.1.8, p.6",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "data_completeness",
      "process_latency",
      "timeline_dependency"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:data_completeness => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:process_latency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:timeline_dependency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "ONC_004_ONE_LINE_DIAGRAM",
    "doc_id": "ONCOR_STD_520_106",
    "loc": "Section 4.1.6, p.6",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "data_completeness",
      "engineering_review",
      "process_latency"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:data_completeness => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:process_latency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "LL_QA_006_MATERIAL_CHANGE",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA",
    "loc": "p.7, Planning Guide Section 9.2.3",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "re_study",
      "timeline_risk"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 2.5,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:re_study => wait +1.5",
      "tag:timeline_risk => wait +1"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "LL_QA_010_RESTUDY_QUEUE",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA",
    "loc": "p.10, \"studies of other nearby large\"",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "queue_density",
      "re_study",
      "timeline_risk"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 3.5,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:queue_density => wait +1",
      "tag:re_study => wait +1.5",
      "tag:timeline_risk => wait +1"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "PG9_011_PROJECT_INFO_UPDATE_10_BUSINESS_DAYS",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE",
    "loc": "p.130, Section 9.2.3 (\"within ten Business Days\")",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "process_latency",
      "re_study",
      "timeline_risk"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 2.5,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:process_latency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:re_study => wait +1.5",
      "tag:timeline_risk => wait +1"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "PG9_012_DYNAMIC_MODEL_CHANGE_IMPACTS_LLIS",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE",
    "loc": "p.130, Section 9.2.3 (\"dynamic model information used in the LLIS stability study\")",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "dynamic_stability",
      "re_study",
      "study_dependency",
      "timeline_risk"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 2.5,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:dynamic_stability => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:re_study => wait +1.5",
      "tag:study_dependency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:timeline_risk => wait +1"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "PG9_026_MATERIAL_CHANGE_NOTIFY_LEAD_TSP",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE",
    "loc": "p.130, Section 9.2.3(2) (\"The ILLE shall notify the lead TSP if a change to the load composition, technology, or parameters occurs\")",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "process_latency",
      "re_study",
      "timeline_risk"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 2.5,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:process_latency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:re_study => wait +1.5",
      "tag:timeline_risk => wait +1"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "PG9_027_NEW_STABILITY_STUDY_DETERMINATION_IF_SUBSTANTIAL_CHANGE",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE",
    "loc": "p.130, Section 9.2.3(2) (\"the lead TSP shall determine whether a new stability study is required and provide a written explanation\")",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "dynamic_stability",
      "re_study",
      "study_dependency",
      "timeline_risk"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 2.5,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:dynamic_stability => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:re_study => wait +1.5",
      "tag:study_dependency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:timeline_risk => wait +1"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "RESTUDY_001_MATERIAL_CHANGE_UNDER_BATCH_CYCLE",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_LLI_BATCH_STUDY_PPT_20260122",
    "loc": "Slide 5-7, ERCOT-Large-Load-Batch-Studies-LLWG_01222026.pptx (Slide 5: Transitional Batch Zero and restudy context; Slide 7: TSP role changes impacting in-progress LLI requests during batch transition)",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "batch_study",
      "queue_dependency",
      "re_study",
      "restudy_risk",
      "timeline_risk"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 5.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:batch_study => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:queue_dependency => wait +1",
      "tag:re_study => wait +1.5",
      "tag:restudy_risk => wait +1.5",
      "tag:timeline_risk => wait +1"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "RESTUDY_002_QUEUE_DISRUPTION_NEARBY_MUST_STUDY",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_MARKET_NOTICE_A122325_01",
    "loc": "p.1, M-A122325-01 – LONG DESCRIPTION: structural challenges including \"coordination across TSPs, repeated restudies, and a growing backlog.\" Also corroborated by Q&A Rev.12.15.25 p.10: \"A common reason re-studies are needed is that another large load customer in the same area becomes a must-study load.\"",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "batch_study",
      "queue_density",
      "restudy_risk",
      "study_dependency",
      "timeline_risk"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 3.5,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:batch_study => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:queue_density => wait +1",
      "tag:restudy_risk => wait +1.5",
      "tag:study_dependency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:timeline_risk => wait +1"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "BATCH_001_BATCH_STUDY_PROCESS_PENDING_POLICY",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_LLI_BATCH_STUDY_WORKSHOP_20260203",
    "loc": "ERCOT-Large-Load-Batch-Study-Workshop-02032026.pptx, Slide 5 (background) and Slide 8 (batch process overview); PUCT Open Meeting presentation planned for 2026-02-20.",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "batch_study",
      "governance_dependency",
      "study_dependency",
      "timeline_risk"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 1.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:batch_study => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:governance_dependency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:study_dependency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:timeline_risk => wait +1"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "LL_QA_007_REQUIRED_STUDIES",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA",
    "loc": "p.8–9, \"What types of reliability studies are required?\"",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "dynamic_stability",
      "short_circuit",
      "steady_state",
      "study_dependency"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:dynamic_stability => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:short_circuit => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:steady_state => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:study_dependency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "LL_QA_008_SSO_REQUIRED",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA",
    "loc": "p.8, \"Subsynchronous Oscillation study (SSO study)\"",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "dynamic_study",
      "energization_gate",
      "sso",
      "study_dependency"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:dynamic_study => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:sso => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:study_dependency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "ONC_002_VOLTAGE_AVAILABILITY",
    "doc_id": "ONCOR_STD_520_106",
    "loc": "Section 3.4.1, p.3",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "voltage_selection_risk"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.5,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:voltage_selection_risk => upgrade +0.5"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "ONCOR_520_106_SYSTEM_PROTECTION_REQUIREMENTS",
    "doc_id": "ONCOR_STD_520_106",
    "loc": "p.8, Sec 6.0 \"System Protection Requirements\" (protection requirements depend on POD/location/line protection)",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "protection",
      "upgrade_exposure"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:protection => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:upgrade_exposure => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "ONC_001_TRANSMISSION_VOLTAGE_SCOPE",
    "doc_id": "ONCOR_STD_520_106",
    "loc": "Section 1.1, p.1",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "transmission_scope"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": []
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "ONC_005_FAULT_INTERRUPT_RATING",
    "doc_id": "ONCOR_STD_520_106",
    "loc": "Section 5.2.1, p.7",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "protection",
      "short_circuit",
      "upgrade_exposure"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:protection => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:short_circuit => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:upgrade_exposure => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "ONC_006_DUAL_FAULT_SENSING_CLOSE",
    "doc_id": "ONCOR_STD_520_106",
    "loc": "Section 6.1.1, p.8",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "protection",
      "upgrade_exposure"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:protection => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:upgrade_exposure => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "ONC_007_6_CYCLE_CLEARING",
    "doc_id": "ONCOR_STD_520_106",
    "loc": "Section 6.1.1, p.8",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "protection",
      "upgrade_exposure"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:protection => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:upgrade_exposure => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "ONC_008_3_CYCLE_BREAKER",
    "doc_id": "ONCOR_STD_520_106",
    "loc": "Section 6.1.2, p.11",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "protection",
      "upgrade_exposure"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:protection => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:upgrade_exposure => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "ONC_009_REVENUE_METERING",
    "doc_id": "ONCOR_STD_520_106",
    "loc": "Section 3.6.1, p.3–4",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "metering_requirement"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:metering_requirement => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "ONC_011_LOAD_REMOVAL_RIGHT",
    "doc_id": "ONCOR_STD_520_106",
    "loc": "Section 7.1.3, p.22",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "curtailment_risk",
      "operational_constraint"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 3.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:curtailment_risk => ops +2",
      "tag:operational_constraint => ops +1"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "PG9_029_CANCELLATION_RISK_IF_SECTION_9_5_NOT_SATISFIED_180_DAYS_AGREEMENTS",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE",
    "loc": "p.138, Section 9.4(9) (\"If the requirements of Section 9.5, have not been satisfied within 180 days after the communication of the completion of the LLIS\")",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "cancellation_risk",
      "process_latency",
      "timeline_risk"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 3.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:cancellation_risk => wait +2",
      "tag:process_latency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:timeline_risk => wait +1"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "PG9_029B_CANCELLATION_RISK_IF_SECTION_9_5_NOT_SATISFIED_180_DAYS_FINANCIAL_SECURITY",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE",
    "loc": "p.138, Section 9.4(9) (\"If the requirements of Section 9.5, have not been satisfied within 180 days after the communication of the completion of the LLIS\")",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "cancellation_risk",
      "financial_security",
      "process_latency",
      "timeline_risk"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 3.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:cancellation_risk => wait +2",
      "tag:financial_security => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:process_latency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:timeline_risk => wait +1"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "LLI_EN_001_WRITTEN_APPROVAL_REQUIRED",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST",
    "loc": "p.3, \"may not proceed until written approval\"",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "energization_gate",
      "process_latency"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:process_latency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "LLI_EN_003_LLIS_COMPLETE",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST",
    "loc": "p.2, \"All studies required per the Large Load Interconnection Study process have been completed and approved\"",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "energization_gate",
      "study_dependency"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:study_dependency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "LLI_EN_004_SSO_APPLICABILITY",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST",
    "loc": "p.2, \"Is a SSO study required for this Large Load interconnection?\"",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "data_completeness",
      "energization_gate",
      "study_dependency"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:data_completeness => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:study_dependency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "LLI_EN_004_SSO_COMPLETE",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST",
    "loc": "p.2, \"The SSO study is complete and all required mitigation is in place\"",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "dynamic_stability",
      "energization_gate",
      "sso",
      "study_dependency"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:dynamic_stability => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:sso => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:study_dependency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "LLI_EN_007_MODEL_CONSISTENCY",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST",
    "loc": "p.2, \"no changes have been made to the load composition\"",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "dynamic_stability",
      "re_study",
      "timeline_risk"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 2.5,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:dynamic_stability => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:re_study => wait +1.5",
      "tag:timeline_risk => wait +1"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "LLI_EN_012_DME_APPLICABILITY",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST",
    "loc": "p.2, \"Disturbance Monitoring Equipment (DME) is required\"",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "data_completeness",
      "energization_gate",
      "process_latency"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:data_completeness => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:process_latency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "LL_QA_013_RIDE_THROUGH",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA",
    "loc": "p.14–15, \"voltage and frequency ride-through risks\"",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "curtailment_risk",
      "dynamic_stability",
      "operational_constraint"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 3.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:curtailment_risk => ops +2",
      "tag:dynamic_stability => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:operational_constraint => ops +1"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "PG9_021_ENERGIZATION_SSO_COMPLETE_IF_REQUIRED",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE",
    "loc": "p.141, Section 9.6(d) (\"Subsynchronous Oscillation (SSO)\")",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "dynamic_stability",
      "energization_gate",
      "sso",
      "study_dependency"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:dynamic_stability => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:sso => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:study_dependency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "PG9_022_ENERGIZATION_CURRENT_LCP_REQUIRED",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE",
    "loc": "p.141, Section 9.6(e) (\"Submission of a current Load Commissioning Plan (LCP)\")",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "commissioning_plan",
      "data_completeness",
      "energization_gate",
      "process_latency"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:commissioning_plan => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:data_completeness => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:process_latency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "PG9_023_LLIS_COMPLETION_COMMUNICATED",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE",
    "loc": "p.100, (\"ERCOT has communicated the completion of the LLIS\")",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "energization_gate",
      "process_latency",
      "study_dependency"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:process_latency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:study_dependency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "PG9_030_365_DAY_INITIAL_ENERGIZATION_RESTUDY_OPINION",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE",
    "loc": "p.138, Section 9.4(10) (\"within 365 days after the Initial Energization date identified in the LLIS study report, the lead TSP shall provide an opinion to ERCOT on whether any of the completed LLIS elements require restudy\")",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "re_study",
      "timeline_risk"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 2.5,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:re_study => wait +1.5",
      "tag:timeline_risk => wait +1"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "PUCT_003_RULEMAKING_MAY_AFFECT_ENERGIZATION_REQUIREMENTS",
    "doc_id": "PUCT_PROJECT_58481_LARGE_LOAD",
    "loc": "p.1, PUCT Project No. 58481, docket (Sierra Club comments reference 50% backup generation threshold, SB 6 compliance, and large load qualification standards under 16 TAC §25.194)",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "compliance_dependency",
      "energization_gate",
      "process_latency",
      "puct_rule_pending"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:compliance_dependency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:process_latency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:puct_rule_pending => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "LL_QA_014_365_DAY_RULE",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA",
    "loc": "p.15, Planning Guide Section 9.4(10)",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "re_study",
      "timeline_risk"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 2.5,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:re_study => wait +1.5",
      "tag:timeline_risk => wait +1"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "LL_QA_015_CONSUMPTION_LIMIT",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA",
    "loc": "p.16, Planning Guide Sections 9.2.2 & 9.6",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "commissioning_limit",
      "operational_constraint",
      "timeline_risk"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 1.0,
      "ops": 2.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:commissioning_limit => ops +1",
      "tag:operational_constraint => ops +1",
      "tag:timeline_risk => wait +1"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "LLI_EN_008_NOTIFY_CHANGES",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST",
    "loc": "p.2, \"obligation to notify the interconnecting TSP of changes\"",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "re_study",
      "timeline_risk"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 2.5,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:re_study => wait +1.5",
      "tag:timeline_risk => wait +1"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "LLI_EN_009_CONSUMPTION_LIMIT",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST",
    "loc": "p.2, \"Maintain Load consumption at or below\"",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "commissioning_limit",
      "operational_constraint"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 2.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:commissioning_limit => ops +1",
      "tag:operational_constraint => ops +1"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "LLI_EN_010_PEAK_INCREASE_FORM",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST",
    "loc": "p.3, \"any request to increase the amount of peak Demand\"",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "modification_trigger",
      "re_study",
      "timeline_risk"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 2.5,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:re_study => wait +1.5",
      "tag:timeline_risk => wait +1"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "PG9_014_LCP_UPDATE_AFTER_LLIS_COMPLETION",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE",
    "loc": "p.131, Section 9.2.4(2) (\"Upon the completion of the LLIS\")",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "commissioning_plan",
      "data_completeness",
      "process_latency"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:commissioning_plan => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:data_completeness => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:process_latency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "PG9_015_LCP_UPDATE_AFTER_AGREEMENTS_EXECUTED",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE",
    "loc": "p.131, Section 9.2.4(3) (\"Upon the execution of any required agreements\")",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "commissioning_plan",
      "timeline_dependency"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:commissioning_plan => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:timeline_dependency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "PG9_033_REQUIRED_INTERCONNECTION_EQUIPMENT_BREAKERS_TRANSMISSION_NOT_COLOCATED",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE",
    "loc": "p.131, Section 9.2.5(1) (\"interconnected at transmission voltage\"; \"must have ... breakers capable of interrupting fault current\"; \"remote control\" by TO)",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "process_latency",
      "protection",
      "upgrade_exposure"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:process_latency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:protection => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:upgrade_exposure => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "PG9_016_STEADY_STATE_ANALYSIS_ELEMENT",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE",
    "loc": "p.135, Section 9.3.4.1 (\"9.3.4.1 Steady-State Analysis\")",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "steady_state",
      "study_dependency"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:steady_state => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:study_dependency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "PG9_017_SYSTEM_PROTECTION_SHORT_CIRCUIT_ELEMENT",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE",
    "loc": "p.136, Section 9.3.4.2 (\"System Protection (Short-Circuit) Analysis\")",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "protection",
      "short_circuit",
      "study_dependency"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:protection => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:short_circuit => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:study_dependency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "PG9_018_DYNAMIC_TRANSIENT_STABILITY_ELEMENT",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE",
    "loc": "p.136, Section 9.3.4.3 (\"Dynamic and Transient Stability Analysis\")",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "dynamic_stability",
      "study_dependency"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:dynamic_stability => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:study_dependency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "BATCH_004_WORKSHOP_PROCESS_ONGOING",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_LLI_BATCH_STUDY_WORKSHOP_20260203",
    "loc": "ERCOT-Large-Load-Batch-Study-Workshop-02032026.pptx, Slide 2 (disclaimer), Slide 47-48 (next steps); PUCT Open Meeting 2026-02-20.",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "batch_study",
      "governance_dependency",
      "policy_update",
      "timeline_dependency"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:batch_study => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:governance_dependency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:timeline_dependency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "QA_REV1215_BATCH_STUDY_REFERENCE_PROCESS",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_MARKET_NOTICE_A122325_01",
    "loc": "p.1, M-A122325-01 (batch study process announcement, Dec 23 2025; PGRR115 already insufficient; batch study as successor framework)",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "batch_study",
      "policy_update",
      "process_latency"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:batch_study => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:process_latency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "MARKET_NOTICE_001_ERCOT_NOTICES_AS_POLICY_SIGNAL",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_MARKET_NOTICE_A122325_03",
    "loc": "p.1, M-A122325-03 (Jan 30, 2026): draft framework posted for Feb 3 workshop; feedback deadline Feb 5; sets up Feb 12 second workshop; framework to be filed at Feb 20 PUC Open Meeting.",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "batch_study",
      "governance_dependency",
      "market_notice",
      "policy_update"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:batch_study => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:governance_dependency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "rule",
    "source": "published_rule",
    "rule_id": "MARKET_NOTICE_002_ERCOT_NOTICES_A122325_05_LATEST",
    "doc_id": "ERCOT_MARKET_NOTICE_A122325_05",
    "loc": "p.1, M-A122325-05 (Feb 17, 2026): \"PUC recently provided guidance to ERCOT and stakeholders to engage in an expedited process to develop revision requests that create a new Batch Zero study for consideration at the June 1, 2026 ERCOT Board meeting.\"",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "batch_study",
      "governance_dependency",
      "market_notice",
      "policy_update",
      "timeline_risk"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 1.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "tag:batch_study => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:governance_dependency => baseline (not counted toward exposure buckets)",
      "tag:timeline_risk => wait +1"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "heuristic",
    "source": "non_cited_heuristic",
    "rule_id": "HEUR_LOAD_MW_GTE_300",
    "doc_id": "NON_CITED_HEURISTIC",
    "loc": "non-cited heuristic: large load (MW total ≥ 300) increases upgrade exposure pressure",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "mw_threshold",
      "non_cited_heuristic",
      "upgrade_exposure"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 1.0,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "load_mw_total=300.0 => upgrade +1.0"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "heuristic",
    "source": "non_cited_heuristic",
    "rule_id": "HEUR_PHASED_PLAN_REDUCES_UPGRADE_PRESSURE",
    "doc_id": "NON_CITED_HEURISTIC",
    "loc": "non-cited heuristic: phased energization plan can reduce upgrade exposure pressure in screening",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "non_cited_heuristic",
      "phased_plan",
      "upgrade_exposure"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": -0.5,
      "wait": 0.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "energization_plan=phased => upgrade -0.5"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "heuristic",
    "source": "non_cited_heuristic",
    "rule_id": "HEUR_MISSING_INPUTS_PRESENT_INCREASES_WAIT_PRESSURE",
    "doc_id": "NON_CITED_HEURISTIC",
    "loc": "non-cited heuristic: missing inputs increase process waiting/latency pressure",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "data_completeness",
      "non_cited_heuristic",
      "process_latency"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 0.5,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "missing_inputs_count=3 => wait +0.5"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "context",
    "source": "context_snapshot",
    "rule_id": "CTX_queue_density",
    "doc_id": "CONTEXT_SNAPSHOT",
    "loc": "as_of=2026-02-13; source=pilot snapshot (manual); Example context input for v0 demo",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "queue_density"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 2.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "value='high'",
      "multiplier=2",
      "as_of=2026-02-13",
      "source=pilot snapshot (manual)",
      "confidence=0.7",
      "notes=Example context input for v0 demo",
      "mapped via TAG_RISK_CONTRIB['queue_density']"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "context",
    "source": "context_snapshot",
    "rule_id": "CTX_queue_dependency",
    "doc_id": "CONTEXT_SNAPSHOT",
    "loc": "as_of=2026-02-13; source=pilot snapshot (manual)",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "queue_dependency"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 1.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "value=True",
      "multiplier=1",
      "as_of=2026-02-13",
      "source=pilot snapshot (manual)",
      "confidence=0.6",
      "mapped via TAG_RISK_CONTRIB['queue_dependency']"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "context",
    "source": "context_snapshot",
    "rule_id": "CTX_must_study",
    "doc_id": "CONTEXT_SNAPSHOT",
    "loc": "as_of=2026-02-13; source=pilot snapshot (manual)",
    "trigger_tags": [
      "must_study"
    ],
    "contributions": {
      "upgrade": 0.0,
      "wait": 1.0,
      "ops": 0.0
    },
    "notes": [
      "value=True",
      "multiplier=1",
      "as_of=2026-02-13",
      "source=pilot snapshot (manual)",
      "confidence=0.8",
      "mapped via TAG_RISK_CONTRIB['must_study']"
    ]
  },
  {
    "kind": "summary",
    "upgrade_score": 1.0,
    "wait_score": 58.0,
    "ops_score": 10.0,
    "baseline_upgrade": 14.0,
    "baseline_wait": 94.5,
    "baseline_ops": 2.0,
    "status": "rule_driven_v0",
    "timeline_estimate": {
      "study_results_floor_date": null,
      "study_results_floor_source": "",
      "study_results_floor_scenario": "batch_zero_eligible not provided — batch track unknown",
      "months_to_study_floor": null,
      "post_study_min_months": 6,
      "post_study_max_months": 12,
      "post_study_source": "PG9_029_CANCELLATION_RISK_IF_SECTION_9_5_NOT_SATISFIED_180_DAYS_AGREEMENTS (PG §9.4(9), 180-day window) + PG9_034_NOTICE_TO_PROCEED_INTERCONNECTION_FACILITIES_REQUIRED (PG §9.5.1(iii)) + LLI_EN_011_NETWORK_MODEL (NOM inclusion)",
      "earliest_cod_quarter": null,
      "confidence": "low",
      "status": "unanchored",
      "caveats": [
        "Medium upgrade or elevated wait pressure; timeline likely 12–24 months minimum once batch placement is known",
        "batch_zero_eligible not provided; study floor not calculable — provide batch qualification status to anchor timeline",
        "Without batch anchor, upgrade_score and wait_score directional signals are the only available indicators",
        "upgrade_score=1 (low upgrade exposure); wait_score=58"
      ]
    },
    "upgrade_exposure_bucket": "low",
    "operational_exposure_bucket": "high",
    "reasoning": [
      "baseline_scores: upgrade=14, wait=94.5, ops=2 (tracked but excluded from bucket thresholds)",
      "upgrade_score=1 < 2 => upgrade_exposure_bucket=low",
      "ops_score=10 => operational_exposure_bucket=high",
      "timeline_estimate.status=unanchored; study_floor=n/a; earliest_cod_quarter=n/a; confidence=low"
    ]
  }
]

Provenance

hashes + citation audit

Graph version

0.1

Graph sha256

691de02bae76460dc25094eeccddfd1fc481a77fc10c73bdb95dcd5cae17670f

Rules source

rules/published.jsonl

Rules sha256

0caf3e652c0118a16ce014c30b80b04c94c9e30317cf9175975c55d12647e4c2

Citation audit

off / not_run (errors: , warns: )

Citation audit findings

status	rule_id	doc_id	loc	anchor	message
Not run

doc_id	title	effective_date	artifact path	sha256
`ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA`	ERCOT Large Load Interconnection Process Q&A	`2025-06-01`	`docs/raw/ERCOT_LARGE_LOAD_QA__2025-06-01.pdf`	`e1fba2a7986a8de346331fb6dbc28897b3371d96e621e0a3e69ca90fc14d22f0`
`ERCOT_LLI_BATCH_STUDY_PPT_20260122`	ERCOT Large Load Batch Studies – LLWG Presentation (2026-01-22)	`2026-01-22`	`docs/snapshots/ERCOT_LLI_BATCH_STUDY_PPT_20260122__2026-01-22.pptx`	`03d4f5cfb192d48e55907ef2f89b7218516c6aed7d1caaeda44ca3233cbe45a5`
`ERCOT_LLI_BATCH_STUDY_WORKSHOP_20260203`	ERCOT Large Load Interconnection Batch Study Workshop – Draft Framework (2026-02-03)	`2026-02-03`	`docs/raw/ERCOT_Batch_Study_Workshop_20260203.pptx`	`230d73038e200dbdb10c8736062eef879851df867c187f0656275a4e77bca2a1`
`ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST`	ERCOT Large Load Integration - Standalone Energization Request	`2025-07-07`	`docs/raw/ERCOT_LLI_ENERGIZATION_REQUEST__2025-07-07.pdf`	`86f5154a132c060ae9164d0dacf327f8a2b3daead289c9e03c2f099ddd66d87e`
`ERCOT_LLI_INSTRUCTIONS_COMMUNICATION`	Instructions for Communication of Large Load Information	`2025-12-15`	`docs/raw/ERCOT_LLI_INSTRUCTIONS_COMMUNICATION__2025-12-15.docx`	`fe31682bb5d7470f2cf77684555d50836b12ec5b381bb1dbe00c289f7d908ea5`
`ERCOT_LLI_LOAD_INFORMATION_FORM_V1`	Load Information Form V1	`2025-12-15`	`docs/raw/ERCOT_LLI_LOAD_INFORMATION_FORM_V1__2025-12-15.xlsx`	`ef603b2f78078e84ec5d471160873c0282f9094afad712db872d6dd574feadab`
`ERCOT_MARKET_NOTICE_A122325_01`	ERCOT Market Notice M-A122325-01: Large Load Interconnection Studies Update	`2025-12-23`	`docs/snapshots/ERCOT_MARKET_NOTICE_A122325_01__2025-12-23.html`	`c1d2335acaaae1a4d629337340abcbe6aea63c73c7f574342430e0a68aa76a68`
`ERCOT_MARKET_NOTICE_A122325_03`	ERCOT Market Notice M-A122325-03: Large Load Interconnection Studies Update	`2025-12-23`	`docs/snapshots/ERCOT_MARKET_NOTICE_A122325_03__2025-12-23.html`	`6539080a0125b3114544681b3ad94e9f4a063ed2f4094d709a3669dc1719bcf1`
`ERCOT_MARKET_NOTICE_A122325_05`	ERCOT Market Notice M-A122325-05: Large Load Interconnection Studies Update	`2025-12-23`	`docs/snapshots/ERCOT_MARKET_NOTICE_A122325_05__2025-12-23.html`	`ee9e908b02f1ea623a4d5af61dd807f6bf8ace6ce9c1efa584bde05f4e853e65`
`ERCOT_PGRR_PENDING_LARGE_LOAD_TRACKER`	ERCOT Pending PGRRs – Large Load Relevant (as of 2026-02-28)		None	None
`ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE`	ERCOT Planning Guide	`2025-12-15`	`docs/raw/ERCOT_PLANNING_GUIDE__2025-12-15.pdf`	`bc7cc96c6937ef96345c0f2c1dda1033864f4ccb225b00e7d2ca9c2f4d1164e4`
`ONCOR_STD_520_106`	Oncor Standard 520-106 (Retail Customer Connection Requirements)		`docs/raw/ONCOR_STD_520_106__2023-01-01.pdf`	`eca927c9faad4bd6d77bcf95b5179e7b00ec42f24ed28c38b0e9782977dc022d`
`PUCT_PROJECT_58481_LARGE_LOAD`	PUCT Project No. 58481 – Large Load Interconnection Proceeding (Rule Draft/Discussion)		`docs/snapshots/PUCT_PROJECT_58481_LARGE_LOAD__2026-02-26.pdf`	`0f19c9ae3319a15bb2ed0df73dbe7cc909b9ffefd066fad37034f1d1e715450d`

DC ONCOR 300MW Energization Check 2026Q3

Executive Summary

Project Snapshot

Visual Snapshot

Options Comparison

Energization Checklist

Project Details

Context Snapshot

Process Path

Missing Inputs

Uncertainty & Dependencies

Levers Detected

Parallel Flags

Risk Details

Provenance